Wiki Article

Active Liberty

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution
Active Liberty cover
AuthorStephen Breyer
LanguageEnglish
PublisherVintage Books
Publication date
October 17, 2005
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint (Hardcover)
Pages161
ISBN0-307-26313-4
OCLC59280151
Preceded byBreaking the Vicious Cycle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation (1994) 
Followed byAdministrative Law and Regulatory Policy: Problems, Text, and Cases (2006) 

Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution is a 2005 book by United States Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.[1] The general theme of the book is that Supreme Court justices should, when dealing with constitutional issues, keep "active liberty" in mind,[1] which Justice Breyer defines as the right of the citizenry of the country to participate in government. Breyer's thesis is commonly viewed as a liberal response to originalism, a view espoused by Justice Antonin Scalia.[2]

Background

[edit]

Active Liberty is based on the Tanner Lectures on Human Values that Breyer delivered at Harvard University in November 2004.[3]

Reception

[edit]

In a review of Active Liberty, Pierre Rosanvallon said that Breyer's arguments are convincing but they would be benefit from being "more firmly grounded if he had also touched on the Constitution's textual vagueness".[4] Richard A. Posner of the University of Chicago Law School negatively reviewed the book, stating that, despite the merits of the book as a short and accessible but influential contribution to constitutional debate, is it not convincing to him.[5]

Political scientist Kenneth I. Kersch framed Breyer as drawing from Hart and Sachs' The Legal Process textbook. Noting that this textbook was never published for use beyond Harvard Law School because its authors were unable to integrate Brown v. Board of Education (1954) with their framework of judicial pragmatism, Kersch argued that Breyer's emphasis on active liberty would similarly be unfit for difficult constitutional questions.[6]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Hudson, David D. (2007). The Rehnquist Court: Understanding Its Impact and Legacy. New York: Praeger Publishers. p. 52. ISBN 978-0-275-98971-2.
  2. ^ Sullivan, Kathleen M. (February 5, 2006). "Consent of the Governed". The New York Times.
  3. ^ Breyer, Stephen (November 2004). "Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution" (PDF). Harvard University. Retrieved June 30, 2022.
  4. ^ Rosanvallon, Pierre (June 13, 2007). "Book review: Active Liberty". International Journal of Constitutional Law. 5 (3): 564–567. doi:10.1093/icon/mom015.
  5. ^ Posner, Richard A. (2006). "Justice Breyer Throws Down the Gauntlet". The Yale Law Journal. 115 (7): 1699–1717. doi:10.2307/20455666. JSTOR 20455666. Retrieved June 30, 2022.
  6. ^ Kersch, Ken I. (2006). "Justice Breyer's Mandarin Liberty". The University of Chicago Law Review. 73 (2): 759–822. ISSN 0041-9494.
[edit]