DZ
DefZone.Net

Kien thuc cong nghe & giai tri

Wiki Article

Draft:FBI Section 702 query violations

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Xem trên WikipediaBài ngẫu nhiên khác
  • Comment: Seems good to me, but would like another set of eyes before accepting. ~Politicdude (talk, contribs) 20:35, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Comment: This strikes me more like an undergrad research paper on the subject than an encyclopedic article. The heavy reliance on court documents that are synthesized with the subject of this article reflects original research. By cutting out that material and ensuring content primarily reflects reliable secondary sources, this draft could reach a point where it is suitable for acceptance. Pbritti (talk) 04:36, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Comment: This topic is likely notable, but the draft contains a significant amount of unsourced content, original research through novel interpretation of primary documents, and neutral point of view issues. I'd recommend rewriting this draft in a way that sticks strictly to summarising what is contained in reliable, secondary sources about this incident, rather than relying heavily on interpretation of declassified documents. MCE89 (talk) 06:54, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

FBI Section 702 query violations were a series of compliance failures by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) involving warrantless searches of communications collected under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Between 2020 and early 2022, Bureau personnel conducted more than 278,000 searches of surveillance databases that did not meet legal standards.[1][2][3][4]

The queries targeted Black Lives Matter protesters, January 6 Capitol attack participants, congressional campaign donors, journalists, members of Congress, and crime victims. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) characterized these as "persistent and widespread violations".[1][5] The revelations, disclosed publicly in May and July 2023 through declassified FISC opinions, triggered congressional debate over Section 702's April 2024 reauthorization. A proposed warrant requirement for such searches failed by a single vote in the House of Representatives.[6][7]

Background on Section 702

[edit]
Main articles: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and FISA of 1978 Amendments Act of 2008

Section 702 of FISA, enacted in 2008 as part of the FISA Amendments Act, authorizes targeted intelligence collection of foreign intelligence information from non-U.S. persons reasonably believed to be located outside the United States.[8] Unlike traditional FISA warrants requiring individualized probable cause determinations, Section 702 operates through annual certifications approved by the FISC, which reviews general targeting, minimization, and querying procedures rather than individual surveillance targets. The National Security Agency (NSA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), FBI, and National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) collect communications through two primary methods: PRISM (direct collection from internet service providers) and upstream collection (from internet backbone infrastructure).[9]

Under the statute, intentionally targeting U.S. persons or anyone located in the United States or "reverse targeting" or surveilling foreigners in order to collect information about Americans is prohibited.[8] However, when foreigners under Section 702 surveillance communicate with Americans, those U.S. person communications are "incidentally collected" and stored in intelligence databases. Intelligence agencies can then query these databases using American identifiers. These are known as "backdoor searches" or "U.S. person queries" to retrieve Americans' communications without obtaining warrants.[8][10] By 2022, approximately 246,000 foreign targets were under Section 702 surveillance, increasing to 292,000 by 2024.[11]

Intelligence value

[edit]

The U.S. intelligence community and successive presidential administrations have described Section 702 as among the most valuable intelligence collection authorities available. FBI Director Christopher A. Wray told Congress in December 2023 that Section 702 had helped disrupt terrorist attacks, identify foreign spies, and track fentanyl shipments.[12][13]

In a joint statement, DNI Avril Haines and NSA Director Paul Nakasone called Section 702 a source of "critical foreign intelligence" on threats including terrorism, weapons proliferation, and hostile cyber activities.[14] CIA Director William Burns said the program had been crucial for stopping drug cartels moving fentanyl across the U.S. border, while Haines told lawmakers the law had helped counter China's spying efforts.[15]

During the April 2024 reauthorization debate, intelligence officials briefed House members on specific cases including identification of a Chinese fentanyl precursor shipment 48 hours before arrival and disruption of a plot by Iranian operatives to assassinate a U.S. official on American soil.[7]

Attorney General Merrick Garland personally lobbied members of Congress against warrant requirements, with the Biden administration characterizing Section 702 as "indispensable" to national security.[7]

Supporters argued that the FBI's U.S. person queries despite compliance failures produced actionable intelligence. In 2023, the FBI stated queries helped identify ransomware actors targeting U.S. critical infrastructure and foreign agents seeking to recruit Americans with security clearances.[16] The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, while recommending reforms, concluded that Section 702 "remains highly valuable to protect national security" and "has proven to be a valuable tool in the government's efforts to protect national security".[17][18]

Critics countered that the intelligence community had not identified specific cases where warrantless searches of Americans' communications, rather than foreign target surveillance, proved essential to preventing attacks. They argued warrant requirements would not impede legitimate intelligence collection.[19][20]

Scale and timeline of violations

[edit]

Early violations (2017–2018)

[edit]

Early compliance failures were documented in 2019 when the FISC rebuked the FBI for tens of thousands of improper searches.[21][22]These included over 70,000 queries in March 2017 related to security reviews of people requiring FBI building access and 6,800 Social Security number queries on a single day in December 2017.[22]

Peak violation period (2020–2021)

[edit]

Compliance problems peaked between late 2020 and early 2021. Bureau analysts ran more than 278,000 queries of Section 702 data that the Department of Justice determined violated FBI standards.[2][23][5] The searches failed to meet the legal standard requiring queries be "reasonably likely to retrieve foreign intelligence information or evidence of a crime".[4]

Query volume and decline

[edit]

FBI searches for Americans' information dropped 94% over a 12-month period ending in November 2022, falling from 3.4 million to approximately 204,000 according to an Office of the Director of National Intelligence transparency report.[15] The decline followed changes adopted in summer 2021 after a FISC judge and the Justice Department inspector general accused the FBI of abusing its Section 702 authority.[15]

The downward trend continued in subsequent years. Query numbers fell to approximately 119,000 in 2022, then to 57,000 in 2023.[24] By 2024, queries had dropped to approximately 5,500.[25]

Compliance rates improved from 82% before reforms to 96% afterward, based on FBI internal audits.[26]

Searches of political figures and donors

[edit]

News reports on the declassified court documents revealed that an FBI analyst ran a batch query of over 19,000 donors to a congressional campaign.[27][3] According to The Boston Globe, the analyst claimed the campaign was a target of foreign influence, but Justice Department reviewers determined only eight of the 19,000 identifiers had sufficient ties to foreign influence activities.[3] The identity of the congressional campaign was not publicly disclosed.

Representative Darin LaHood (R-Illinois) publicly revealed in March 2023 that he believed he was a member of Congress improperly queried by the FBI. CNN and The Washington Post reported that LaHood stated at a House Intelligence Committee hearing: "It is my opinion that the member of Congress that was wrongfully queried multiple times solely by his name was in fact me."[28][29] According to news reports on a declassified ODNI compliance report, FBI personnel had conducted multiple queries on an unnamed congressman using only his last name, which reviewers deemed "overly broad".[28][29]

Racial justice protesters

[edit]

Agents queried 133 people arrested during protests following George Floyd's death in late May 2020.[23][3][30] The FBI initially defended these searches as compliant but later reversed position after a Justice Department review found the queries lacked specific connections to terrorist-related activity.[3]

January 6 Capitol attack participants

[edit]

Bureau staff ran more than 20,000 queries on individuals affiliated with groups suspected of involvement in the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.[23][4][3] The Justice Department later determined these searches were not likely to find foreign intelligence information or evidence of a crime.[4] Senior FBI officials attributed the violations to "confusion among the workforce and a lack of common understanding about the querying standards".[26]

Searches of a U.S. Senator and state officials (2022)

[edit]

A court opinion released July 21, 2023, disclosed that violations involving high-profile targets continued after the FBI implemented reforms.[31][32][33] In June 2022, an FBI analyst ran queries using the last names of a sitting U.S. Senator and a state senator "without further limitation". The analyst claimed a foreign intelligence service was targeting those legislators, but the Justice Department's National Security Division determined the searches did not meet FBI standards.[31] The FBI notified the U.S. Senator but not the state senator; the identities of both officials were not publicly disclosed.[31]

A separate violation occurred in October 2022, when an FBI specialist queried the Social Security number of a state judge who had complained to the Bureau about alleged civil rights violations by a municipal police chief. The search lacked adequate justification and did not receive the pre-approval required for politically sensitive queries.[31] The FBI did not notify the judge.[31]

Other FISA violations

[edit]
See also: Inspector General report on the Crossfire Hurricane investigation

The Section 702 violations occurred alongside other FBI FISA compliance failures during the same period. Inspector General Horowitz's December 2019 report on the Crossfire Hurricane investigation documented 17 significant errors in FISA warrant applications targeting Carter Page, finding FBI personnel "fell far short" of accuracy requirements.[34][35] In congressional testimony, Horowitz stated that "in connection with both our Crossfire Hurricane Review and Woods File Audit, we identified inadequate supervisory review as a significant concern," leading to reforms affecting both Title I FISA warrants and Section 702 queries.[36]

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court findings

[edit]

The Wall Street Journal reported in October 2019 that previously secret court rulings had rebuked the FBI for tens of thousands of improper searches during 2017 and 2018.[22][21] According to Just Security's analysis of a November 2020 ruling, the court found FBI queries had been used in investigations unrelated to foreign surveillance, including healthcare fraud, organized crime, and public corruption cases.[37]

In May 2023, declassified court documents revealed the 278,000 non-compliant queries from 2020-2021.[2][4][5] The court characterized the violations as "persistent and widespread".[5]

A second declassified opinion released in July 2023 revealed additional violations from 2022 involving searches of a U.S. Senator, a state senator, and a state judge.[31][32] Despite the violations, compliance had improved to approximately 98% following FBI reforms.[23]

FISC judges repeatedly raised Fourth Amendment concerns about FBI practices. Boasberg's October 2018 opinion found FBI procedures "not consistent with the Fourth Amendment" when applying a "totality of circumstances" standard balancing privacy intrusion against government interests.[38][22] The court criticized the "broad and apparently suspicionless nature" of batch queries and noted FBI's "lack of common understanding" of querying standards.[38]

Legal experts and civil liberties advocates argued that searching through Section 702 databases for particular Americans' communications constitutes a "search" under the Fourth Amendment requiring a warrant based on probable cause.[20][19]

Response

[edit]

FBI

[edit]

FBI Director Christopher Wray defended the FBI's reform efforts while acknowledging past failures. In December 5, 2023 Senate Judiciary Committee testimony, Wray stated: "These violations never should have happened and preventing recurrence is a matter of utmost priority. The FBI took these episodes seriously and responded rigorously, already yielding significant results in dramatically reducing the number of 'U.S. person queries' by the FBI of the Section 702 database and in substantially improving its compliance rate."[13][12]

Wray emphasized compliance improvements: "The most recent Justice Department report found the reforms working, 99% compliance."[13] However, he opposed warrant requirement proposals, arguing they "would amount to a de facto ban" because applications either would not meet legal standards or would require "expenditure of scarce resources, submission and review of lengthy legal filings, and passage of significant time—which, in the world of rapidly evolving threats, the government often does not have".[13][39][40]

Reforms

[edit]

Following the December 2019 DOJ Inspector General report, FBI Director Christopher Wray announced corrective actions to FISA policies and procedures. NBC News reported in July 2023 that FBI queries of foreign spy data had fallen 94% following reform implementation.[15]

Procedural reforms (2021–2022)

[edit]

Opt-in requirement (Summer 2021): The FBI changed its search systems to require personnel to explicitly opt in to search Section 702 data.[36][41] Previously, Section 702 information was included by default in all FBI database searches. This change drove much of the query reduction from 2.9 million in 2021 to 119,000 in 2022.[24][42][43]

Batch query pre-approval: Beginning in 2021, FBI attorney pre-approval became required for batch queries involving more than 100 query terms.[43][44] In June 2023, Deputy Director Paul Abbate announced expansion of this requirement to all batch queries regardless of size, since large batch queries had been a source of non-compliant searches.[44]

Sensitive query approval hierarchy: The FBI implemented escalating approval requirements for sensitive searches. FBI Deputy Director approval is now required for queries involving U.S. elected officials, presidential or gubernatorial appointees, political candidates, political organizations, and members of the news media. FBI attorney approval is required for queries involving religious organizations and certain other categories.[41][44]

Enhanced documentation requirements: FBI systems now require written justifications for all U.S. person queries demonstrating they meet the three-prong standard: authorized purpose, reasonably designed, and specific factual basis that the query is "reasonably likely to retrieve foreign intelligence information or evidence of a crime".[41][44] Personnel must enter justifications before conducting searches.

Training programs

[edit]

In November 2021, the FBI issued FISA Query Guidance to all national security personnel, along with a two-page "FBI FISA Query Guidance Nutshell" desk reference. The FBI developed the guidance jointly with DOJ National Security Division and ODNI. Mandatory training based on this guidance launched in December 2021, with all personnel required to complete it by end of January 2022 to maintain access to FISA systems. Annual recertification training became required starting December 2022, with completion serving as a gating requirement—failure to complete training results in loss of system access.[41][44]

Office of Internal Auditing

[edit]

In August 2020, Attorney General William Barr established the FBI's Office of Internal Auditing (OIA) in direct response to Inspector General Horowitz's findings.[45][46][47] The office conducts continuous internal compliance reviews and routine audits of Section 702 queries, FISA minimization procedures, and National Security Letter usage.[46] The OIA's first audit (April 2020–March 2021) established an 82% compliance baseline before reforms. A subsequent audit found 96% compliance post-reforms—a 14 percentage point improvement.[43][45]

Accountability measures

[edit]

In June 2023, the FBI announced a "three-strike policy" for agents who violate query rules, with escalating consequences up to potential dismissal, though the agency retains discretion in determining penalties.[48][44] The FBI also began including FISA compliance in performance evaluations for field office leadership.[48]

Civil liberties organizations characterized these internal reforms as insufficient, arguing that previous oversight measures "repeatedly touted as robust" had failed to prevent abuses including searches of protesters, political donors, and members of Congress.[48]

DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz

[edit]

Inspector General Michael Horowitz documented FISA compliance failures through multiple reports and congressional testimony. His December 2019 "Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation" identified 17 significant inaccuracies and omissions in FISA applications targeting Carter Page, finding FBI personnel "fell far short" of requirements that applications be "scrupulously accurate".[34][35][49]

Horowitz's March 2020 Management Advisory Memorandum and final September 2021 Woods Procedures Audit Report found over 400 instances of non-compliance with factual accuracy requirements in just 29 FISA applications reviewed.[50][51][52] The audit also revealed 183 FISA applications (out of over 7,000 authorized between January 2015 and March 2020) were missing required Woods Files documentation either partially or entirely.[51][52]

At an April 27, 2023 House Judiciary Subcommittee hearing titled "Fixing FISA: How a Law Designed to Protect Americans Has Been Weaponized Against Them," Horowitz testified on three oversight needs: effective supervisory review in real time, effective routine internal oversight to identify errors close to occurrence, and periodic external independent reviews by the Inspector General and other oversight entities.[36][53]

A September 2022 Horowitz report on the FBI Office of General Counsel revealed that for several years, DOJ National Security Division and FBI OGC maintained differing interpretations of the Section 702 query standard. This confusion led to numerous compliance incidents and, according to a senior FBI OGC official cited in the report, the FBI "almost losing its Section 702 authorities".[36]

Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board

[edit]

The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB), an independent executive branch agency, released a Section 702 report on September 28, 2023. Lawfare and Stars and Stripes reported that the board split on key recommendations, with the report concluding Section 702 "remains highly valuable to protect national security" but creates "serious privacy and civil liberties risks".[54][55]

The PCLOB found that FBI conducted over 200,000 U.S. person queries in 2022—more than the CIA, NSA, and NCTC combined, which collectively conducted only several thousand queries. The board could not obtain government estimates of how many Americans' communications were incidentally collected under Section 702.[17]

The PCLOB issued 19 recommendations (adopted by 3–2 vote), with the most significant calling for FISC authorization of U.S. person query terms before searches could be conducted, with exceptions only for consent and exigent circumstances.[55] Other recommendations included codifying prohibition on "abouts" collection, ensuring each batch query term individually meets standards, and requiring DOJ to annually review each FBI field office's compliance.[17]

Chair Franklin issued a separate statement recommending a probable cause standard for FBI queries seeking evidence of crime, arguing "search through Section 702 communications data seeking information about a particular American constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment" requiring traditional warrant protections. Two board members—Beth Williams and Richard DiZinno—dissented, calling the policy analysis "deeply flawed" and arguing the report "undervalues key aspects of the program, especially U.S. person queries".[17][56]

Congressional oversight

[edit]

Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) and Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) led efforts to impose warrant requirements through the Security and Freedom Enhancement (SAFE) Act.[57][58] Durbin stated, "I will only support the reauthorization of Section 702 if there are significant reforms", focusing on addressing "warrantless surveillance of Americans in violation of the Fourth Amendment".[58]

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) criticized the FBI, repeatedly citing the "204,000 improper searches" figure in hearings and public statements.[59] Jordan questioned whether the FBI should query databases on American citizens at all. His committee advanced legislation including warrant requirements, while the House Intelligence Committee under Chairman Mike Turner (R-Ohio) produced competing bills with more modest reforms favored by the intelligence community.[60]

The Senate Intelligence Committee, chaired by Mark Warner (D-Virginia), advanced the FISA Reform and Reauthorization Act with more limited reforms.[61] Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chair Marco Rubio (R-Florida) co-sponsored this approach. Senate critics including Ron Wyden (D-Oregon), Rand Paul (R-Kentucky), and Ted Cruz (R-Texas) who pushed for more substantial privacy protections.[62]

Following the April 2023 transparency report showing the 94% decline in searches, Turner and LaHood issued a joint statement calling for "substantive and meaningful reforms to help deter abusive behavior by the FBI in the FISA process" and said "without additional safeguards, a clean reauthorization of 702 is a non-starter".[15] Representative Jim Himes (D-Connecticut), ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee, said the decline "provides strong evidence that the reforms already put in place, particularly at FBI, are having the intended effects".[15]

Civil liberties and constitutional concerns

[edit]

Civil liberties organizations opposed Section 702 reauthorization without warrant requirements. The American Civil Liberties Union, through attorneys Patrick Toomey and Kia Hamadanchy, argued Section 702 "is routinely used against Americans, immigrants, and people who are not accused of any wrongdoing" and that the FBI "continues to break the rules" despite reform promises.[20]

The Brennan Center for Justice, through analysts including Elizabeth Goitein and Faiza Patel, published documentation arguing Section 702 had "morphed into a domestic surveillance tool" that violated Fourth Amendment prohibitions on warrantless searches.[19][63] A 31-organization coalition including the Brennan Center, ACLU, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Center for Democracy and Technology, and Electronic Privacy Information Center opposed reauthorization without structural reforms.[64][65]

EFF analysts documented the FBI's pattern of making reform promises followed by continued violations: the FBI pledged compliance improvements after revelations in 2013, 2016, 2017, and 2018, yet violations persisted.[64] Analysts for The Center for Democracy and Technology concluded this pattern indicated "procedural reforms will not break pattern of misuse in the future", requiring statutory warrant requirements with judicial oversight rather than internal FBI policy changes.[66]

Constitutional concerns centered on several issues: the volume of warrantless searches (up to 3.4 million in 2021), use of surveillance for domestic crimes unrelated to national security (healthcare fraud, bribery, public corruption), political surveillance risks (congressional donors, protesters, journalists, elected officials), and lack of individualized suspicion before accessing Americans' communications. Critics argued these practices violated core Fourth Amendment principles requiring warrants based on probable cause before government searches of citizens' private communications.[19][17]

Civil liberties advocates drew comparisons to earlier FBI surveillance abuses. The Center for Democracy and Technology stated in May 2023 that "the systemic misuse of this warrantless surveillance tool has made FISA 702 as toxic as COINTELPRO and the FBI abuses of the Hoover years".[67] The Church Committee's 1975 investigation of COINTELPRO abuses had led directly to FISA's creation in 1978.[19]

Aftermath

[edit]

Impact on Section 702 reauthorization

[edit]

Section 702 was set to expire on December 31, 2023. These compliance failures complicated what intelligence officials expected to be routine reauthorization, with coalitions of progressive Democrats and libertarian-conservative Republicans united in opposition to renewal without reforms.[68][69]

In December 2023, Congress inserted a four-month extension into the National Defense Authorization Act after Speaker Mike Johnson pulled competing bills from the floor when the House Rules Committee refused to allow simultaneous votes.[68][70] The new expiration date of April 19, 2024, set the stage for final negotiations.[68][70]

On April 12, 2024, the House voted on an amendment from Republican Andy Biggs and Pramila Jayapal amendment to require warrants for backdoor searches. The vote tied 212–212—the closest Congress has come to requiring warrants for such searches.[6][7][71][72] The tie meant the amendment failed. The breakdown showed 128 Republicans and 84 Democrats voting yes, while 86 Republicans and 126 Democrats voted no, reflecting cross-party divisions.[6][7] Speaker Johnson voted against the amendment, drawing criticism from conservative allies who noted he had previously supported warrant requirements before becoming speaker.[7]

The Biden administration lobbied against the warrant requirement, with Attorney General Merrick Garland making personal calls to members on the morning of the vote.[7] Administration officials circulated memos calling the amendment a "threat to national security" and "reckless policy choice". Intelligence officials briefed members in classified settings near the House floor, citing specific cases including a Chinese fentanyl precursor shipment identified through a 702 query just 48 hours before arrival.[7]

Warrant requirement supporters, including Representatives Andy Biggs (R-Arizona), Pramila Jayapal (D-Washington), Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), and Jerry Nadler (D-New York), argued the FBI's 278,000 violations demonstrated internal reforms were insufficient and judicial oversight was essential to protect Fourth Amendment rights.[72] A YouGov poll found that 75% of Americans supported warrant requirements,[73] while a poll from Morning Consult found that 55% of Americans supported renewal of Section 702.[74] Opponents argued warrant applications would either fail to meet legal standards or take too long to process during time-sensitive national security threats, effectively creating a "de facto ban" on a vital intelligence tool.[75][76]

The Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act (RISAA, H.R. 7888), which reauthorized Section 702 warrant requirements, passed the House 273–147 on April 12, 2024.[77][78] The bill contained a two-year extension, shortened from five years to accommodate conservative concerns .[7] The final bill required FBI supervisor or attorney approval for all U.S. person queries and barred political appointees from the approval process. Enhanced approval requirements applied to sensitive queries involving elected officials, media, and religious organizations. The legislation prohibited queries "solely designed to find evidence of criminal activity" (with narrow exceptions), codified annual training requirements, and mandated that the FBI Director report annually to Congress on accountability actions. The DOJ Inspector General must assess FBI compliance and reform effectiveness by October 2025.[79][80] RISAA also expanded the definition of "electronic communication service provider" potentially requiring hotels, libraries, and coffee shops with WiFi to assist surveillance—a provision Senator Ron Wyden called "the most dramatic and terrifying expansion of government surveillance authority in history".[81][82]

The Senate approved RISAA 60–34, voted in the early morning hours of April 20, 2024, with final passage at approximately 12:40 AM, just 40 minutes after the midnight statutory deadline.[83][84][82] The Senate voted on six reform amendments, all of which failed.[85] This included the Durbin-Cramer warrant requirement amendment (42–50, needing 60 votes)[86][87] and the Wyden amendment to strike the expanded ECSP definition (34–58).[81][88] Supporters included Intelligence Committee leaders Mark Warner (D-VA) and Marco Rubio (R-FL), while opponents included from civil liberties advocates including Dick Durbin (D-IL), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Rand Paul (R-KY), Mike Lee (R-UT), and Ted Cruz (R-TX).[83][89][90]

President Biden signed the bill into law on April 20, 2024, reauthorizing Section 702 through April 20, 2026.[91][92]

Continuing controversies

[edit]

In January 2025, a federal district court ruled that backdoor searches of Section 702 databases ordinarily require warrants, calling the practice a violation of Fourth Amendment protections.[93][94][95][20] This ruling, combined with the shortened two-year reauthorization, means the Section 702 debate will resume in 2026. Civil liberties groups such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation characterized the 212–212 vote as evidence that warrant requirements could succeed in future legislation[64]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Contreras, Rudolph (April 21, 2022). "Memorandum Opinion and Order (2021 FISC Certification Opinion)" (PDF). Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  2. ^ a b c "U.S. court finds FBI improperly searched foreign intelligence data 278,000 times". Reuters. May 19, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  3. ^ a b c d e f "FBI misused surveillance tool on Jan. 6 suspects, BLM arrestees and others". The Boston Globe. May 19, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  4. ^ a b c d e "FBI misused the Section 702 database on Americans. What is it?". The Washington Post. May 19, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  5. ^ a b c d Irwin, Lauren (May 19, 2023). "FBI repeatedly misused surveillance tool, unsealed FISA order reveals". The Hill. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  6. ^ a b c "Final Vote Results for Roll Call 114 (Biggs Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888)". Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives. April 12, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i Wong, Scott; Kapur, Sahil; Kaplan, Rebecca (April 12, 2024). "House votes to renew FISA spying tool after earlier Republican revolt". NBC News. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  8. ^ a b c De Luce, Dan; Dilanian, Ken (July 31, 2023). "FISA Section 702: What it is and why Congress is debating it". NBC News. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  9. ^ "Section 702: What It Is & How It Works" (PDF). Center for Democracy and Technology.
  10. ^ "White House panel advises limiting FBI's access to powerful spy tool". The Washington Post. July 31, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  11. ^ "Annual Statistical Transparency Report". Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  12. ^ a b "FBI director Wray to call for renewal of key surveillance tool". NBC News. December 5, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  13. ^ a b c d "Director Wray's Opening Statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee". Federal Bureau of Investigation. December 5, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  14. ^ "Joint Statement on Section 702 from DNI Haines, NSA Director General Nakasone, and FBI Director Wray". Office of the Director of National Intelligence. 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  15. ^ a b c d e f De Luce, Dan (April 28, 2023). "FBI warrantless searches of citizen data plunged in 2022, report says". NBC News. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  16. ^ "Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and Section 702". Federal Bureau of Investigation. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  17. ^ a b c d e "Report on the Surveillance Program Operated Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act" (PDF). Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board. September 28, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  18. ^ Chauvin, Noah (2023-10-11). "Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board Embraces Surveillance Reforms". Brennan Center for Justice. Retrieved 2025-12-30.
  19. ^ a b c d e Goitein, Elizabeth (2024). "Why Congress Must Reform FISA Section 702 and How It Can". Brennan Center for Justice. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  20. ^ a b c d "Court Rules Warrantless Section 702 Searches Violated the Fourth Amendment" (Press release). American Civil Liberties Union. January 22, 2025. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  21. ^ a b "FISA court found FBI conducted tens of thousands of improper searches of intelligence database". The Hill. October 8, 2019. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  22. ^ a b c d Volz, Dustin; Tau, Byron (October 8, 2019). "FBI's Use of Surveillance Database Violated Americans' Privacy Rights, Court Found". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on October 9, 2019. Retrieved December 30, 2025.
  23. ^ a b c d Gazis, Olivia (July 21, 2023). "FBI conducted improper searches of U.S. officials in foreign surveillance database". CBS News. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  24. ^ a b Gazis, Olivia (April 30, 2024). "Number of searches on Americans in FBI foreign intelligence database fell in 2023, report shows". CBS News. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  25. ^ "Mum's the Word on FISA Section 702 Reauthorization". Lawfare. November 11, 2025. Retrieved December 22, 2025.
  26. ^ a b "FBI broke rules in scouring foreign intel on Jan. 6 riot, court says". NBC News. May 19, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  27. ^ Spunt, David (May 19, 2023). "FBI improperly used warrantless search powers more than 278,000 times in 2021, FISA court filing reveals". Fox News. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  28. ^ a b "Republican congressman slams FBI for allegedly searching his name in intelligence database". CNN Politics. March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  29. ^ a b "Republican Congressman Darin Lahood says his name was wrongly searched by FBI". The Washington Post. March 9, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  30. ^ "The FBI Is Back to Its Old Habits: Illegally Spying on Protesters". The Nation. July 3, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  31. ^ a b c d e f "FBI wrongly searched for U.S. senator and state senator in Section 702 spy data, court says". NBC News. July 21, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  32. ^ a b "FBI improperly used Section 702 surveillance powers on US senator". The Hill. July 21, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  33. ^ "FBI improperly used FISA database to search for info about U.S. senator, state officials". Axios. July 21, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  34. ^ a b Horowitz, Michael E. (December 9, 2019). "Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation". Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  35. ^ a b "Watchdog Report Says FBI Was Justified In Opening Trump-Russia Investigation". NPR. December 9, 2019. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  36. ^ a b c d "Statement of Michael E. Horowitz, Inspector General, U.S. Department of Justice Before the U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary". Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General. September 2022. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  37. ^ Laperruque, Jake (April 28, 2021). "Key Takeaways From Latest FISA Court Opinion on Section 702 and FBI Warrantless Queries". Just Security. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  38. ^ a b Boasberg, James E. (October 18, 2018). "Memorandum Opinion and Order (2018 Section 702 Certification)" (PDF). Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  39. ^ Tarinelli, Ryan (December 5, 2023). "FBI director warns senators on surveillance reauthorization". Roll Call. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  40. ^ "FBI director makes plea for 702 reauthorization without a warrant requirement". The Hill. December 5, 2023. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  41. ^ a b c d Gerstell, Glenn S. (July 7, 2023). "How FBI Querying Under FISA Section 702 Works". Lawfare. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  42. ^ "Joint Statement on Section 702 Query Statistics". U.S. Department of Justice, National Security Division. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  43. ^ a b c "Reforming Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act for a Digital Landscape". Center for Strategic and International Studies. October 15, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  44. ^ a b c d e f "FBI Deputy Director Highlights Bureau's New FISA Query Accountability Procedures" (Press release). Federal Bureau of Investigation. June 13, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  45. ^ a b "FBI Releases Results of OIA FISA Query Audit" (Press release). Federal Bureau of Investigation. May 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  46. ^ a b "Barr orders more changes in FBI surveillance under FISA". NBC News. September 1, 2020. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  47. ^ "Barr issues new rules for FBI surveillance warrants of political figures". CBS News. September 1, 2020. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  48. ^ a b c "Bipartisan Coalition Responds to the FBI's New Policies Under Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Authority". Brennan Center for Justice. June 13, 2023. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  49. ^ "Takeaways from the Senate hearing with Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz". CNN. December 11, 2019. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  50. ^ "Management Advisory Memorandum for the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Regarding the Execution of Woods Procedures for Applications Filed with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Relating to U.S. Persons". Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General. March 31, 2020. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  51. ^ a b "Audit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Execution of Its Woods Procedures for the Applications Filed with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Relating to U.S. Persons". Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General. September 30, 2021. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  52. ^ a b Klein, Adam I. (January 18, 2023). "What the Inspector General's Latest FISA Report Can (and Can't) Tell Us". Lawfare. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  53. ^ "Inspector General: FBI's FISA compliance error rate 'around 30 percent'". Washington Examiner. April 27, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  54. ^ "PCLOB's Split on FISA Section 702, Explained". Lawfare. September 29, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  55. ^ a b "Split privacy board urges big changes to Section 702 surveillance law". Stars and Stripes. September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 24, 2025.
  56. ^ "Reforming FISA Section 702: Communications searches should require a court order". The Washington Times. October 30, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  57. ^ "Lee, Durbin Introduce Bipartisan SAFE Act to Reform FISA Section 702" (Press release). Office of Senator Mike Lee. March 14, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  58. ^ a b "Durbin Announces Bipartisan Legislation to Reform FISA Section 702" (Press release). Senate Judiciary Committee. March 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  59. ^ "Looming deadline to extend warrantless surveillance powers sparks congressional scramble". The Hill. November 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  60. ^ "Johnson yanks dueling FISA bills in another embarrassing misstep". Punchbowl News. Archived from the original on 2025-10-15. Retrieved 2025-12-30.
  61. ^ "Two Bills and the Congressional Divide over Section 702 Reauthorization". Lawfare. November 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  62. ^ "Wyden Urges Colleagues to Reject Expanding Warrantless FISA 702 Surveillance" (Press release). Office of Senator Ron Wyden. April 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  63. ^ Goitein, Elizabeth; Patel, Faiza (March 5, 2025). "Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA): Resource Page". Brennan Center for Justice. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  64. ^ a b c Crocker, Andrew; Guariglia, Matthew (January 22, 2025). "Victory: Federal Court Finally Rules Backdoor Searches of 702 Data Unconstitutional". Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  65. ^ "EPIC Statement on Final Passage of RISAA". Electronic Privacy Information Center. April 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  66. ^ "CDT, Civil Liberties Groups Endorse Bipartisan Bill to Reform Section 702". Center for Democracy & Technology. November 7, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  67. ^ "Shocking New FBI Political Surveillance Disclosures Highlight Need for FISA Reform". Center for Democracy and Technology. May 19, 2023. Retrieved November 25, 2025.
  68. ^ a b c "Defense policy bill includes short-term extension of controversial government surveillance program". CNN. December 7, 2023. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  69. ^ "Speaker Johnson takes heat from House conservatives over short-term extension of warrantless surveillance powers". The Hill. December 7, 2023. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  70. ^ a b "Congress passes temporary extension of FISA Section 702 surveillance program". Axios. December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 10, 2025.
  71. ^ "House passes modified surveillance bill after it failed earlier this week". CNN. April 12, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  72. ^ a b "House approves contentious FISA bill in bipartisan vote". The Hill. April 12, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  73. ^ "NEW POLLING: As Mass Surveillance Debate Reaches Final Stages in Congress, Americans Demonstrate Overwhelming Support for Increased Privacy Protections". Demand Progress Education Fund. 2023-12-14. Retrieved 2025-12-30.
  74. ^ "What U.S. Voters Think of Renewing a Key Government Surveillance Tool". Morning Consult Pro. Retrieved 2025-12-30.
  75. ^ Tucker, -Eric; Tucker, Associated Press Eric; Press, Associated (2023-11-15). "A key U.S. spy program will lapse at year's end unless Congress and the White House can cut a deal". PBS News. Retrieved 2025-12-30.
  76. ^ "FBI Director: FISA 702 warrant requirement 'de facto ban'". Archived from the original on 2025-10-06. Retrieved 2025-12-30.
  77. ^ "Final Vote Results for Roll Call 119 (H.R. 7888 Final Passage)". Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives. April 12, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  78. ^ "House approves surveillance authority reauthorization bill". Roll Call. April 12, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  79. ^ Marquis, Preston; Reynolds, Molly (2024-04-16). "House Passes Section 702 Reauthorization". Lawfare.
  80. ^ "H.R. 7888 - Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act". Congress.gov. April 20, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  81. ^ a b "Wyden and Lummis Introduce Amendment to Roll Back Unprecedented Expansion of Warrantless FISA Surveillance" (Press release). Office of Senator Ron Wyden. April 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  82. ^ a b "Senate passes bill renewing key FISA surveillance power moments after it expires". NBC News. April 20, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  83. ^ a b "U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 150 (H.R. 7888 Final Passage)". United States Senate. April 19, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  84. ^ "Biden signs reauthorization of surveillance program into law despite privacy concerns". NPR. April 20, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  85. ^ Jalonick, -Mary Clare; Jalonick, Associated Press Mary Clare; Press, Associated (2024-04-20). "Senate passes renewal of key U.S. surveillance program just after midnight deadline". PBS News. Retrieved 2025-12-30.
  86. ^ "Durbin, Cramer File Bipartisan Amendment to the FISA Reauthorization Bill" (Press release). Office of Senator Dick Durbin. April 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  87. ^ "Senate duo pushes for warrant requirement in foreign spy bill". The Hill. April 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  88. ^ Bolton, A., Beitsch, R. (2024), "Senate approves extension of FISA surveillance just after deadline", The Hill, retrieved 30 December 2025 ‌
  89. ^ "Durbin Votes Against FISA Reauthorization Bill" (Press release). Office of Senator Dick Durbin. April 20, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  90. ^ "FISA Section 702 Reauthorized for Two Years". Lawfare. April 22, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  91. ^ "Biden signs bill reauthorizing contentious FISA surveillance program". CBS News. April 20, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  92. ^ "Biden signs bill that reauthorizes key US surveillance authority". CNN. April 20, 2024. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
  93. ^ United States v. Hasbajrami, 2025 WL 447498 (E.D.N.Y. January 21, 2025).
  94. ^ "FBI's Warrantless Search Ruled Unconstitutional in a Blow to Government Spying". The Intercept. January 27, 2025. Retrieved December 6, 2025.
  95. ^ "Court Says Warrant Needed for U.S. Person Queries of FISA Section 702 Data". Just Security. January 29, 2025. Retrieved November 24, 2025.
[edit]