Draft talk:Bitget

This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Business portal This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Companies Companies portal This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Finance & Investment This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Cryptocurrency This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Binance as a template

structure (paragraph History and Legal status) and infobox fields copied from the Binance article Belle Femme Emmo (talk) 13:14, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

History (Anatoly Shariy)

Below is suggested content (not sure if reliable sources), but cool story as well. I leaving it here on consideration more experienced editors.

In 2024, Bitget delisted tokens that were associated with Anatoly Shariy. Exchange's executive promoted token called GRIMACE on his social profiles,^[1] and was subject of journalist investigation.^{[citation needed]} According to the Kommersant, reported that Russian police investigated a series of arson incidents affecting properties associated with people connected to token creator amid the dispute. Shariy publicly denied involvement.^[2][3][4]

1. "Bitget's COO: We will ramp up expansion in the CIS and Ukraine in 2024". ForkLog. 22 March 2024. Retrieved 6 January 2026.
2. "«РИА Новости»: полиция проверяет причастность блогера Шария к поджогам". Kommersant (in Russian). 15 January 2024. Retrieved 6 January 2026.
3. "Поджоги квартир в Петербурге: задержали группировку". Kommersant (in Russian). 7 February 2024. Retrieved 6 January 2026.
4. "Notice of Delisting 7 Spot Trading Pairs on 18 March 2024". Bitget Support Center. 15 March 2024. Retrieved 6 January 2026.

Belle Femme Emmo (talk) 14:34, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of references for WP:42

1. Evan Luthra on Bitget or this one 2. Lionel Messi on Bitget 3. [hack on Bitget] Belle Femme Emmo (talk) 06:38, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Submission declined on 8 January 2026 by MelbourneIdentity (talk).

Source assessment table prepared by User:Belle Femme Emmo

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
AMF FRancee[1]			(short regulator warning; not an in-depth, analytical profile)	✘ No
ASIC[2]			(regulatory warning; describes licensing/leverage risks, not an in-depth, fails GNG/CORPDEPTH)	✘ No
Finance Magnates [3]				✘ No
FCA (UK) [4]			(general FCA press release about CFDs; not about Bitget as the subject; fails significant coverage of Bitget)	✘ No
Sports Business Journal [5]			(short sponsorship/partnership news item; largely routine announcement, not in-depth)	✘ No
SportsPro [6]				✘ No
Cointelegraph [7]			~ (weak for GNG/CORPDEPTH)	✘ No
Forbes India [8]			~	~ Partial
Crypto.news [9]			~ (weak for GNG/CORPDEPTH)	✘ No
ForkLog [10]	(content is an interview based on executive statements; also marked “AI translated”)	~	(in-depth interview, but not secondary/analytical coverage)	✘ No
YouTube (Anatoly Shariy) [11]		~	(generally not WP:RS, but long “journalism investigation” (2 parts. part2 mentioned;	? Unknown
Kommersant [12]			(not about Bitget as a subject)	✘ No
Kommersant [13]			(not about Bitget as a subject)	✘ No
CryptoRank [14]				? Unknown
CryptoPolitan [15]				? Unknown
Bitget Support Center [16]			(primary source; fails for GNG/CORPDEPTH)	✘ No
Cointelegraph [17]				✔ Yes
Cointelegraph [18]				✔ Yes
Cointelegraph [19]				✔ Yes
ForkLog [20]		~		~ Partial
Decrypt [21]				✔ Yes
Incrypted [22]				✔ Yes
WuBlockchain (Medium) [23]		~	~ (may be detailed but generally not WP:RS coz of Medium)	~ Partial
charltonsquantum[24]			(not in-depth)	✘ No
FI.ee [25]			(not in-depth)	✘ No
ASC (Canada) Investor Caution List [26]			(not in-depth)	✘ No
FSA (Japan) PDF [27]			(FSA warning)	✘ No
The Edge Malaysia [28]			(not in-depth)	✘ No
The Guardian[29]			(secondary; substantial context and in-depth)	✔ Yes
The Washington Post[30]			(secondary; substantial context and in-depth)	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Belle Femme Emmo (talk) 08:16, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Many of these sources you have listed as 'reliable' are not reliable at all, per countless past discussion on WP:RSN and elsewhere. None of these crypto outlets are generally reliable. Some may be reliable in some specific contexts, but that would have to be discussed on a case-by-case basis. Further, government documents are WP:PRIMARY. Start with reliable, independent sources, and use primary sources second. Unreliable sources, like Cointelgraph, Decrypto, WP:FORBESCON, etc. should only be used for a specific reason, and never for demonstrating WP:N. Likewise, churnalism and press releases are of little value, here. Grayfell (talk) 04:09, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

to avoid signs of WP:SYNTH I removed entire Grimace-Anatoly Shariy story. on other stories - I want to say that if I use (sometimes) primary sources, then this is given as a fact from the primary source, but is not used to prove the significance of the subject. Look at the other cryptocurrency exchanges, it feels like my drafts for Hyperliquid, Bitget, and MEXC contain far fewer primary sources than their articles.

crypto outlets - removed. googled to search alternatives - if no found - removing. it is OK.

Offtop: thank you for marking all my created articles in the mainspace by

You could do the same thing here. Someone will improve it later. as I see no one helps with drafts, but a page in the mainspace has a chance of being noticed by someone. I think I've reached the limit of my understanding of Wikipedia when it comes to improving declined drafts. Ofttop 2: sorry for edit war with you on ByBit. As I said, sometimes I've reached the limit of my understanding how it works. Belle Femme Emmo (talk) 11:05, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You could do the same thing here. That makes it sound like you want other people to clean up your messes. Before you submit this yet again, remove all of the crypto sources and see what's left. No Cointelegraph, no 'Ledger Insights' no Forklog, no 'Charltons Quantum'. Don't use bad sources as an excuse to add original research. Start with reliable sources. Grayfell (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good lesson. Thank you. Done. (wow, I found even more reliable one source instead of 2 weak sources on Bybit loan) Belle Femme Emmo (talk) 09:07, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]