Wiki Article
File:GeorgeToogoodSmith.png
Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net
Summary
[edit]| Description | George Toogood Smith in the garden at Mendips. |
|---|---|
| Author or copyright owner |
Unknown |
| Source (WP:NFCC#4) | Original publication: 2013 Immediate source: https://stephenkpeeples.com/news-and-reviews/lewisohn-beatles-author-u-s-tune-in/ |
| Use in article (WP:NFCC#7) | George Toogood Smith |
| Purpose of use in article (WP:NFCC#8) | for visual identification of the person in question, at the top of his/her biographical article |
| Not replaceable with free media because (WP:NFCC#1) |
As the subject has been deceased since 1955, no free equivalent could be found. |
| Minimal use (WP:NFCC#3) | It will be used to identify the subject in the infobox only. |
| Respect for commercial opportunities (WP:NFCC#2) |
It is a low-quality copy of only some of the original image. |
| Other information | The subject of the photograph has been deceased since: 1955 |
| Fair useFair use of copyrighted material in the context of George Toogood Smith//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:GeorgeToogoodSmith.pngtrue | |
Licensing
[edit]- to provide visual identification of one or more specific individual(s), or an identifiable gathering of them,
- where the individual(s) concerned are deceased, or where access would for practical purposes be impossible,
- and for whom there is no known representation under a 'free' license,
- on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation,
qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Copyrights.
Please remember that the non-free content criteria require that non-free images on Wikipedia must not "[be] used in a manner that is likely to replace the original market role of the original copyrighted media." Use of historic images from press agencies must only be of a transformative nature, when the image itself is the subject of commentary rather than the event it depicts (which is the original market role, and is not allowed per policy).