Wiki Article
Talk:Alcoholism
Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alcoholism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
| Discussions on this page have often led to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
| Alcoholism has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | ||||||||||||||||
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Alcoholism.
|
| All editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders are copyrighted. Do not post a copy of the official DSM diagnostic criteria in any Wikipedia article. Simply reproducing the entire list in the DSM is not fair use and is a violation of the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria legal policy. Instead, describe the criteria in your own words. See Wikipedia:Copyright violations#Parts of article violate copyright for instructions if the criteria have been copied into the article. Editors may quote a small part of the DSM criteria for a given condition, especially if that quotation is used to discuss the DSM's choice of terminology in that quotation. |
| The content of Sinclair method was merged into Alcoholism. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignments
|
|---|
GA Reassessment
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:52, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
Uncited statements, including the entire "Short term effects" section. The lead might also need to be trimmed a bit. Z1720 (talk) 01:58, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- Please allow me some time to work on this article and the Asprin one as you’ve opened 3 medical GAR recently and these tend to be quite hard to track down citations for. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 07:42, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- @IntentionallyDense: GARs tend to stay open as long as editors are working on them. Please provide periodic updates so that editors know that you are still making progress. Z1720 (talk) 13:33, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- IntentionallyDense, do you still intend to work on this article? No worries if not. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:20, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- i do really hope to, there’s about 5 (guessing, i’m not sure) medical GARs open right now and i’m currently dealing with my own medical issues so i’ve come to the conclusion that i won’t have time to improve all of them but i do want to at least work on this one. I will try to remember to pop by and update people in about a week but if i don’t please feel free to tag me as this will be my first priority as soon as i am well enough. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:02, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Update: I'm slowly trying to pick away at the unsourced bits of the article and I did attempt to trim the lead but I don't think there is much more I can do there for now. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 05:12, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
- i've done some more trimming. Thank you! Tom B (talk) 23:30, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- IntentionallyDense, do you still intend to work on this article? No worries if not. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:20, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- @IntentionallyDense: GARs tend to stay open as long as editors are working on them. Please provide periodic updates so that editors know that you are still making progress. Z1720 (talk) 13:33, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- Please allow me some time to work on this article and the Asprin one as you’ve opened 3 medical GAR recently and these tend to be quite hard to track down citations for. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 07:42, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- People have added sources, e.g. for that section, so it looks like it's been brought up to standard, Tom B (talk) 23:31, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- I added two citation needed tags to the article. Since this is a MED article, I am a little more strict about getting all citation concerns resolved before making any declarations. No page size or sourcing concerns. Z1720 (talk) 15:32, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Z1720 I have fixed both cn tags. The second was on a sentence that was categorically false, so thank you very much for tagging it. Toadspike [Talk] 12:53, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
- (After some digging, that sentence was added waaay back in 2008 [1], at which point it was probably true. Technology has since advanced significantly.) Toadspike [Talk] 22:21, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Z1720 I have fixed both cn tags. The second was on a sentence that was categorically false, so thank you very much for tagging it. Toadspike [Talk] 12:53, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. @Toadspike: Sorry for the delay: I was reviewing another article. Citation concerns are resolved, no other concerns. Z1720 (talk) 01:31, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
American vs. British English
[edit]This article appears to be written primarily in American English (as opposed to British English). I added a message to editors about this point.
As you edit the article, look for inconsistencies, such as using single quotation marks (British English) vs. double quotation marks (American English).
For example, some sentences in the Moderate drinking subsection use 'single quotes' (British English) instead of "double quotes" (American English):
Moderate drinking amongst people with alcohol dependence—often termed 'controlled drinking'—has been subject to significant controversy. Indeed, much of the skepticism toward the viability of moderate drinking goals stems from historical ideas about 'alcoholism', now replaced with 'alcohol use disorder' or alcohol dependence in most scientific contexts. A 2021 meta-analysis and systematic review of controlled drinking covering 22 studies concluded controlled drinking was a 'non-inferior' outcome to abstinence for many drinkers (citations omitted).
If you believe this article should use British English, please explain. Although I live in the United States, I actually prefer British conventions, so I'm open to either. We just need to be consistent.
Resources
- Manual of Style/Spelling » English spelling comparison chart
- Wikipedia Typo Team » British vs American English, etc.
- Bryan A. Garner, Garner's Modern English Usage (5th ed., 2022), p. 902.
Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) [he/him] 02:35, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Assuming you’re willing to convert things over, I believe it is best practice to try to stick with whatever style is used more and add a template (I’m not sure the template name off the top of my head sorry) IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 07:24, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- That was my goal. Please correct any errors I might have made. Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) [he/him] 11:20, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Improving top-importance medicine articles: Join the Vital Signs campaign 2026
[edit]The goal of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Vital Signs 2026 campaign is to bring all 101 top-importance articles—including this one—up to at least B-class quality. Many of these articles are widely read but overdue for review, so even small improvements can have a big impact.
If you watch or edit this article, your help would be very welcome. You can:
- Add yourself as a participant
- Note the state of the article in the Progress table (is the current class still correct?)
- Update the article based on recent clinical guidelines and review papers
- Help address gaps, improve clarity for a broad audience, or improve image selection
To reach B class, articles should have: suitable referencing, reasonable coverage, a clear structure, good prose, helpful illustrations, and be understandable to a broad audience. Contributions of any size are appreciated. Femke (talk) 16:00, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Native Americans
[edit]From the description here about the evolution of alcoholism or alcohol consumption it would follow that all humanity developed a tolerance to it at some level. If that's the case why has alcohol consumption been so devastating for Native Americans? If the consumption of naturally occurring fermented fruit was the original food that introduced humans to alcohol then why don't Native Americans have more tolerance to alcohol? Seeing as we all came out of Africa, and therefore all of us would've eaten fruit that was fermented why is it that Native Americans cannot tolerate it well? I think it's because the agricultural revolution made fermentation of food much easier and much more common. After all, grains can be made into alcohol too, not just fruit. And the domestication of grain was an integral part of the agricultural revolution. Native Americans did not heavily rely on agriculture for the source of their food before contact with Europeans. Most tribes lived the lives of hunter-gatherers and while they did plant corn it was not on the scale that other societies, like European societies, relied on domesticated plants. And so Native Americans didn't build up a tolerance to alcohol the way societies did that relied on agricultural as their primary source of food. I don't think it was naturally occurring fermented fruit that built up a tolerance to alcohol in early humanity. I think it was the agricultural revolution that made alcohol readily available from the fruit in orchards and the grain in fields. ~2025-36456-77 (talk) 12:37, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
"Anticraving" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Anticraving to the article Substance dependence#Anti-addictive drugs has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 18 § Anticraving until a consensus is reached.
Note: Several similar redirects are bundled with this discussion. —Myceteae🍄🟫 (talk) 07:43, 18 January 2026 (UTC)


