Talk:Apple Watch

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Apple Watch article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 4 months

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: retarget, 24 June 2014, see discussion. delete, 22 March 2013, see discussion.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Apple Inc. Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Apps Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Contribute to the project: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles Brands Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Telecommunications Low‑importance Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Technology Technology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Watches (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Watches, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2023-11-01/apple-health-blood-pressure-glucose-sleep-apnea-team-issues

B class?

Does anyone think this deserves a B class now? Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 14:26, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There's a few statements in the article that should have reference supporting them, like the last sentence of Apple Watch#Third generation (Series 3) and Apple Watch#Design and materials for example, those are claims that seem like important information that need sources (a requirement for B-class at Wikipedia:Content assessment#Grades). Those aren't the only examples, but looking through the article the unsourced information jumps out as a barrier to currently meeting B-class. - Aoidh (talk) 23:42, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoidh Thank you for your feedback. It seems like there are a lot of citation works needed. I will continue working on this article for verifiability. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 00:28, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Update on blood oxygen for Series 9, Ultra 2

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2025/08/an-update-on-blood-oxygen-for-apple-watch-in-the-us/ 154.160.1.1 (talk) 16:22, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SE (1st generation) - move the descriptive paragraph down so that the 5th Gen discussion and the SE discussion are separate

Right now, they are somewhat interlaced, which makes it somewhat confusing, especially since the SE is grouped with the 5th (but is an amalgamation of notable features of the 3rd and 4th model), but was launched on the same date as the 6th.

Since it has the same physical size and processor as the 5th, I think it should stay in this section, but the discussion of the two could be more readable. 50.225.142.68 (talk) 20:18, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should the blood oxygen monitoring fix be described as a loophole?

I’m wondering if it should be described as a legal loophole Generikuser (talk) 20:30, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Major Changes Needed

The article has a lot of data that is not needed at all. A lot of sales stats are added although they have the right citations and references. They feel extra but they make it appear to be promotional articles. Can they all be removed to achieve neutrality or should citations and references be left as is. TheInklessScribe (talk) 11:59, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]