Talk:Athenidelphax

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Insects Low‑importance Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Costa Rica Low‑importance Costa Rica portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Costa Rica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Costa Rica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Only one source

I have used only one source, as this is the only published literature on this genus (as of writing this). TheLivingDanish1 (talk) 13:51, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the species page not the same as the genus page if there is only one species?

I did not connect them, as this is a very new genus with lots of potential to gain new species in the future. This would cause difficulties if they were just one page. TheLivingDanish1 (talk) 13:54, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Athenidelphax kennedyae into Athenidelphax

Per WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA William Avery (talk) 14:17, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, per the guideline cited by the nominator. This should be uncontroversial. I left a notice on the article creator's talk page. Since they created both articles, I suggest this discussion be closed early if they agree as well. Chess enjoyer (talk) 01:31, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see that you suggest a merge, which I am fine with. I have never merged articles before, so I kindly suggest you take the lead on this one. Naturally, I will gladly edit the article so the relevant information from both articles becomes pleasingly connected. I have saved both articles in a Word-document, so you can complete the merge at any time. TheLivingDanish1 (talk) 22:09, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]