This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software. Apple Inc. Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I removed the notability tag after adding several references. The TechCrunch article is in the Washington Post at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/02/AR2008060200763.html so I think the notability criterion is satisfied. Echawkes (talk) 05:52, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While I don't want to question the notability, the article currently looks like an advertisment, with statements like "supporting unlimited file sizes for as low as $3.96/month". I'll try to remove and rephrase some of that, but I hope that somebody who knows the company should provide content that does not sound like a press release can provide more useful content. TSawala (talk) 11:01, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The statement found in the Encryption section, "However, because decryption of private keys is done server side, this level of security is unlikely to protect against a government subpoena or serious data breach[citation needed].", was tagged September of 2017. This is now March 2018 and the statement persists. Should there be an acceptable period of review before an assertion is removed to protect the integrity of the wiki? I am tempted to delete the statement now but am still a relative noob in editing. Comments? Smash591 (talk) 02:55, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok to remove such a statement now, since a few months passed. The whole paragraph would need a source addressing the threat model of the system: "take a Trust No One approach" is marketing-speak more than meaningful information. --Nemo 19:09, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The user below has a request that an edit be made to Backblaze. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 283 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies.

I am an employee of Backblaze submitting a few corrections for the page. 1. Under Key people: Frank P. Patchel (CFO) and Kevin Gavin (CMO) no longer work for Backblaze. 2. Under Key people: Please add Marc Suidan (CFO) and Jason Wakeam (CRO). Source: https://www.backblaze.com/company/about 3. Please delete the sentence "Backblaze and Catalogic, a data protection vendor, announced their partnership in March 2022." in the History section. We have many more partnerships than it makes sense to list here, and listing only one is misleading. 4. Under Products: Please add the sentence "In 2025, Backblaze launched B2 Overdrive, high-throughput cloud storage for AI." Here is the source: https://siliconangle.com/2025/11/12/backblaze-ai-training-open-accessible-storage-kubeconna/ 5. Revenue: Update to US$128 million (2024) 6. Operating income: Update to US$-46 million (2024) 7. Net income: Update to US$-49 million (2024) 8. Total assets: Update to US$169 million (2024) 9. Total equity: Update to US$77.6 million (2024) Source for financials: 2024 Annual Report https://s204.q4cdn.com/590551802/files/doc_financials/2024/ar/BLZE-2024-10K.pdf Mclancy24 (talk) 18:42, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]