Wiki Article
Talk:CapitaLand
Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CapitaLand article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
| This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Broken links
[edit]Yikes. If I had noticed there were that many broken links when I started, I would've skipped this page! Tripnoted (talk) 18:04, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Neutrality
[edit]Reads like an advertisement. 2001:9E8:2222:3500:934:8B4A:F36B:D1E8 (talk) 13:08, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Removal of unsourced content
[edit]I have removed material from the article that was not supported by reliable sources. Several statements had been added without citations or were backed only by self-published or unverifiable material which does not meet Wikipedia’s sourcing standards.
Per WP:V and WP:RS, all factual claims, especially those that could be considered contentious or potentially harmful, must be supported by high-quality, independent sources. Unsourced or poorly sourced material cannot remain in the article, regardless of whether it may be true.
Editors are encouraged to reintroduce any removed content once it can be properly cited to reliable, secondary sources. Jackinick (talk) 08:00, 13 January 2026 (UTC)