This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Carl Benjamin article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a contentious topic. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism
Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box)
Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.
Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generating neologisms, so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process).
State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
At the time that gamergate emerged, things around this matter may have been less clear. It should by now be self-evident to self-respecting observers that there are multiple groups that are promoting feminism in games, movies, and other media. See Sweet Baby Inc et al as other examples beyond DiGRA. Then, to call the idea a "conspiracy theory" is done intentionally to discredit the idea, and is not done to truly reflect the state of affairs. To say it plainly, this was and is a smear campaign. Citing other sources who also promote such a smear campaign should not meet the bar for posting an article with integrity. I suggest, a minimum, starting the bar at the definition of conspiracy theory... namely, "when other explanations are more probable". Look, the most probable explanation is that there are groups out there that promote this ideology, and they are now exposed as such.
The cited sources are clear in calling it a conspiracy theory. We follow the citations, not the opinions of an anonymous person on a talk page. See WP:V, WP:NOR. MrOllie (talk) 02:09, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The cited sources do call it a conspiracy theory, though. You can't just say "well I personally think they're wrong, therefore they're unusable as sources"; if you think there are higher-quality sources that dispute what they say, you have to produce them. --Aquillion (talk) 02:56, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Search term: what is the outcome of Digital Games Research Association in terms of feminism in games
Today, google
The Digital Games Research Association (DiGRA) has played a significant role in fostering and advancing feminist game studies, although this has also been a point of contention and criticism.
Key Outcomes and Contributions of DiGRA in terms of Feminism in Games:
Promoting Feminist Research: DiGRA provides a platform for scholars to research and present work on gender and games, including studies on female representation, player experiences, and feminist methodologies in game studies.
Facilitating Dialogue: DiGRA conferences and publications have been important venues for feminist scholars to discuss and debate crucial issues within the field, such as the experiences of women in gaming and the impact of sexist portrayals in games.
Highlighting Inclusivity Issues: DiGRA research has exposed and analyzed the problematic representation of women in games, advocating for more inclusive narratives, diverse characters, and equitable gameplay experiences.
Supporting Feminist Scholars: DiGRA has actively supported feminist scholars in game studies, providing a network and resources for them to pursue their research and work.
Addressing Gamergate: DiGRA has been a focal point in discussions surrounding the Gamergate controversy, which involved attacks on feminist scholars and critics in the gaming community. DiGRA's then-president, Mia Consalvo, defended the work of their members and highlighted the hostility towards feminism demonstrated by some Gamergate supporters.
Influencing Policy and Education: DiGRA's research and discussions can help inform educational practices and potentially influence policy-making to promote diversity and combat sexism in the gaming industry.
Challenges and Criticisms:
DiGRA has faced criticism from those who accuse the association of pushing a "feminist agenda" and colluding with the mainstream media.
Some critics within the Gamergate movement have expressed concern that DiGRA is an ideological group masquerading as academics, attempting to indoctrinate students with feminist viewpoints.
Despite efforts towards inclusivity, there are still challenges to address, such as the persistent issue of harassment and marginalization of women in gaming communities.
In conclusion, DiGRA has been instrumental in the development and visibility of feminist game studies, promoting critical analysis and research on gender in gaming. However, this has also made the association a target of anti-feminist sentiment and criticism. The ongoing discussions and research within DiGRA demonstrate a commitment to addressing gender inequality and fostering a more inclusive and equitable gaming landscape. Danielkwinsor (talk) 03:15, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That you personally think that the sources are biased or wrong still isn't a valid reason to substitute your own opinion, though. Also, don't copy and paste AI nonsense or search engine results onto the talk page. MrOllie (talk) 03:19, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And edit warring to try to force your policy violation to remain on the article is itself a violation of Wikipedia's policies. MrOllie (talk) 03:25, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are right, I have personal thoughts on the matter. My personal thoughts are broadly in line with the consensus thoughts as summarized by the AI search which includes cited sources. I notice those links were not included in a non-rich copy/paste. However, at this point, I again say to you that you are arguing something broadly self-evident, and additionally documented with evidence. It is not a conspiracy theory to say that these organizations, including DiGRA, are promoting feminist ideology. This evidence is including, but not limited to, DiGRA's own publications. Here is DiGRA's own paper.
AI is not a reliable source. And nothing in the paper you linked indicates that DiGRA was plotting to influence game development; that paper analyzes games, it doesn't describe exerting influence over them. Furthermore, it doesn't mention Benjamin. We have to describe and characterize the subject of an article the way reliable sources do; trying to take a paper and arguing "I think that this paper illustrates that he's right tho!" is WP:OR. If the multiple highly-cited papers describing his views here are wrong, you should be able to find reliable sources disputing them specifically. --Aquillion (talk) 09:32, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I was interested to see that Benjamin apparently graduated recently from the University of London as mentioned in the personal life section, which seems surprising to me as he appears to be mostly against the university system. But how do we know that the Carl Benjamin on the university's page is actually him? There is no information other than the name being listed. Also, doesn't this kind of go against WP:BLPPRIMARY? I'll be WP:BOLD and remove it, if someone disagrees please let me know. Aŭstriano (talk) 23:55, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome to put some effort into it and provide specific examples, along with reliable sourcing that either counters the presentation or that confirms that rewriting the text is appropriate. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is.23:17, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
