Talk:Comparison of web browsers

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Internet Mid‑importance Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Software: Computing Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is a former featured list candidate. Please view its sub-page to see why the nomination failed. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the article for featured list status.

Archives

Archive 1 - July 20, 2007 Archive 2 - February 09, 2010

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 30 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4.

Apple planning to abandon JPEG 2000 in Safari 18

According to the French technology news website MacGeneration, Apple is officially planning to remove JPEG 2000 in Safari 18. This marks the official end of JPEG 2000 in web browsers as far as we know. Even the official WebKit blog and devloper notes of Safari 18 has stated that support for JPEG 2000 has been removed, right when WWDC 2024 was happening. Hopefully these sources can be helpful for updating the Image format support section of this page. https://www.macg.co/logiciels/2024/06/safari-18-abandonne-le-jpeg-2000-144235 https://www.webkit.org/blog/15443/news-from-wwdc24-webkit-in-safari-18-beta/ https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safari-release-notes/safari-18-release-notes DeveloperPudú (talk) 02:35, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very much perfect answer 2409:4061:4E18:8EAB:FD03:A298:545C:D4CE (talk) 14:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change Chromium download page back to third party

Until 19 October 2024 there was https://chromium.woolyss.com/ as a download link for Chromium browser. But now download link leads to official Chromium project. Maybe change it back to third party? Because third party link provide "trusted" compiled binaries for Windows, including Windows 7 and 8, Linux and apk-file for Android. 212.112.119.194 (talk) 17:25, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AI integration

What do we think about adding some columns to describe each browser's relationship with AI, a growing matter of concern to users. These could include:
• AI integrated
• Ability to turn AI features off
• Telemetry: metrics sent to browser publisher

Bluewater02 (talk) 13:15, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus information re. Ladybird Browser and update-ability

Ladybird is in a fast-paced state of development, with most features being added to the core web engine before QoL in the user interface, making it hard to keep the tables up-to-date. However someone has added Ladybird to all tables, often with bogus data. I may try to correct this, but I'd argue for not including Ladybird in most tables at this time due to lack of accessible information, requiring manual testing and research of the source code. Kreuner (talk) 19:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]