This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country
Incorrect Information: The entire Yedisan region was not ceded to Russia as a result of the Russo-Turkish War (1768–1774) and the Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca. Only Kilburun was ceded to Russia. The complete annexation of Yedisan by Russia occurred after the Russo-Turkish War (1787–1792) through the Treaty of Jassy. Ömereditss (talk) 14:35, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My guess is that they put them in that order because the other two groups were closer to the Cossacks and suffered more frequent raids? The way the infobox describes the results seem to support that. MilesVorkosigan (talk) 21:44, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Cossack raids largely developed as a reaction to the Crimean–Nogai slave raids in Eastern Europe... and would only decrease in intensity as the Crimean–Nogai ones also did. That's the explanation for it.
Although it would make sense putting the Ottoman Empire higher here as it did have a more leading role, so I would agree with putting it higher. In the Crimean–Nogai slave raids in Eastern Europe article the Ottoman Empire is lower due to being the supporters rather than being directly involved, but in here it's different since they were the direct targets and with the explanation I gave of having a more leading role. StephanSnow (talk) 11:12, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Alan Fisher believes this population decline forced the Ottomans to reassess the costs of maintaining their administrative and garrison presence in Crimea; after 1676 they gradually ceded their jurisdiction in Crimea to the khans so that they could devote greater resources to maintaining their presence in Podolia and reinforcing their garrisons on the lower Dnepr." StephanSnow (talk) 22:19, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you were asking about "The Cossack raids largely developed as a reaction to the Crimean–Nogai slave raids in Eastern Europe" part, that's written at the heading of this article. StephanSnow (talk) 22:36, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
.svg)
