Creativity is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Invention, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Invention on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InventionWikipedia:WikiProject InventionTemplate:WikiProject InventionInvention
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
This article was copy edited by Dhtwiki, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 2–19 January 2025.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
Added a subsection summarizing the concept of teleonomic creativity (Pudmenzky, 2001–2003). Sources include a PhD thesis, a conference paper, and a peer-reviewed mathematical journal article. Section written neutrally with [citation needed] tags where independent adoption is not yet verified. Lexi2025 (talk) 08:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section would need much stronger claims to notability to retain. It seems even you yourself doubt it given the line in the last para "While teleonomic creativity has not yet achieved broad adoption in mainstream creativity studies". If this has not yet achieved adoption after more than 20yrs it is unlikely it ever will. Also central concepts/author are redlinked (so probably not notable). PhD dissertation and conference proceeding may be ok but likely primary sources and among those not of prime importance. A single reviewed paper (once again primary) add little substance.
Please make a convincing case this idea is currently relevant to mainstream debate by providing secondary sources before re-adding. Arnoutf (talk) 08:57, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]