Wiki Article

Talk:Curitiba Pride

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Did you know nomination

[edit]

1st Curitiba Diversity Parade in 1995
1st Curitiba Diversity Parade in 1995
  • ... that Curitiba Pride (pictured) was the first in Brazil, marking the foundation of ABGLT? Source: Gomes, José Cleudo; Zenaide, Maria de Nazaré Tavares (July 5, 2019). "A trajetória do movimento social pelo reconhecimento da cidadania LGBT". #Tear: Revista de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia. 8 (1). doi:10.35819/tear.v8.n1.a3402. ISSN 2238-8079.
    • ALT1: ... that the first pride parade in Brazil occurred in Curitiba (pictured)? Source: "Há 20 anos, Curitiba sediou a primeira parada gay do Brasil". Revista Lado A (in Brazilian Portuguese). June 30, 2015. Archived from the original on May 6, 2021. Retrieved January 17, 2026.
    • Reviewed:
    • Comment: There was Rio one that happened later in that year (July). Despite being more than 168 hours after the article was created, it was "expanded" (final translation) by Questionadora ávida, so I hope this counts.
Created by Questionadora ávida (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Abesca (talk) 18:04, 24 January 2026 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article long enough, created within the window (nominated on 24 Jan, which is the seventh day from its creation on 17 Jan -- I don't think we usually split hairs about the hours), fully cited and generally in good shape. QPQ not required. The image is a bit of a problem: it's Public Domain in Brazil, but also needs to be PD in the United States for us to host it on Commons: unless someone has explicitly released the rights to it, it almost certainly isn't. You could upload a local version to Wikipedia to solve this. However, I would suggest running any hook without this particular picture, which doesn't display well at small scale.
I'm not convinced that the current hooks pass WP:DYKINT: surely the first Pride parade in Brazil had to happen somewhere, so why is it interesting that it happened here? I must admit I'm struggling to find good alternatives in the article, but am happy to help workshop them. UndercoverClassicist T·C 15:20, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Looking through the article here, I have to agree. The "first" hooks both need strong sourcing per WP:DYKHOOKCITE, while the article is currently lacking in usable hooky material. Maybe if the article is expanded further, more hooks could be suggested. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:09, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
A curiosity could be that it used the acronym GLT in 1995, which is a uncommon term still currently. And that it was changed to just diversity. There are other pictures from Commons. Abesca (talk) 18:47, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
There might be something in the "Diversity" name change -- do we have any idea why they made this change? Does the event now encompass more communities than "just" LGBT+? UndercoverClassicist T·C 19:22, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging article creator Questionadora ávida and nominator Abesca for their input here. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:52, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
According to the source, it was only changed because of organization organizing it changed in 2005. It's said that the original acronym was GLT in 1995, which is an uncommon initialism. At that time, LGBT wasn't regularly official, until 2008, in which they changed from GLBT to LGBT. Probably because of so many inconsistent acronyms popped up that they changed, but I couldn't find any reported instance/source saying specifically that. ~~
So what about:

Abesca (talk) 03:03, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]