Talk:Disorganized schizophrenia

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology Mid‑importance Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Disability Disorganized schizophrenia is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Medicine Low‑importance Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Disorganized schizophrenia. PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles) The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine. Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Untitled

I thought it was sometimes called hebephrenic schizophrenia because of the apearance of silly and childish mannerisms rather than for its onset in youth.--NeantHumain 03:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no delusions or hallucinations prominent

can someone please cite where they got the following:

"Unlike the paranoid subtype of schizophrenia, delusions and hallucinations are not the most prominent feature, although fragmentary delusions and hallucinations may be present." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sp0 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've added two references from websites.Jv821 (talk) 08:47, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can we get a DSM-IV number? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.161.6.102 (talk) 01:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added with source. You can find these with a simple Google search ;) EconomicsGuy (talk) 16:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hebe, the cupbearer of the Gods in Greek mythology, is a male, not a "goddess"108.54.104.62 (talk) 22:51, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, Hebe was a Goddess. You are thinking of her brother, Jebe. 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:E9F9:AEC3:90BA:8E73 (talk) 08:45, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"three-factor model"

It may be appropriate to reflect fashionable parlance in the field, or it may be more encyclopaedic to attempt a pedagogical effort to correct it. Anyway, many researchers in psychiatric disorders are enamoured of a few basic statistical methods they do not really understand and venerate as a kind of magic. With that comes this weird and awkward use of technical terminology such as model and factor. Never mind the crazies; it is their doctors that show themselves up as imbeciles. 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:E9F9:AEC3:90BA:8E73 (talk) 08:43, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Model and factor are used correctly in the page. If you have a problem with the page, you can edit it. Chamaemelum (talk) 08:45, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Does the painting really contribute anything to the article? It doesn't seem relevant to me. EllieDellie (talk) 18:00, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EllieDellie, you are quite right. The title of the painting is Indolence, not "Disorganized schizophrenia". Please feel free to remove it. Lova Falk (talk) 14:38, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the lock

please 105.99.39.44 (talk) 15:50, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hebephrenia

Singing and reiterating phrase without auditory hallucination 105.99.39.44 (talk) 15:53, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia shall be a serious, reliable, and verifiable encyclopedia; thus, I strongly advice you to find WP:MEDRS compliant sources for further suggestions. Although it is fully possible in the technical sense to just write stuff without adding a citation, there is a great likelihood that articles taken seriously by others will not include such content for long. Most likely, most editors here are not looking to WP:BITE you, but perhaps reading the aforementioned "bite" article would make you undertand the perspective of others maintaining this article, too. I would suggest you check out a few Wikipedia pages for getting started:

• Wikipedia:Citing sources
• Help:Getting started
• WP:INTREFVE (visual referencing for beginners)
• Wikipedia:Verifiability

BlockArranger (talk) 18:08, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

iwant to contribute

Remove protection Boumboumr (talk) 17:04, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can indeed help construct this article. Either you can suggest edits here, or you can become WP:AUTOCONFIRMED through contributing elsewhere first. For example, you could check out the Wikipedia:Manual of Style and go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors, where you can find articles in need of improvement through copy editing. This will hopefully also make you more familiar with the Wikipedia community. BlockArranger (talk) 02:00, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]