Talk:Environmental crime

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Environmental crime article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Environment Mid‑importance Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Mid‑importance Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Crime and Criminal Biography High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of crime and criminal biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environmental Crime Analysis

Sources are reliable however the writing is very biased. The enforcement section needs the most work regarding NPOV and is straight plagiarism of the sources. The other sections require a lot more work as well. The Enforcement section should not be the largest section. (Prancing Prongs 9:13, November 16, 2020.)

EU directive

https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/criminal-justice/environmental-crime_en

Expansion of article

I am working with 2 peers to expand the article on Environmental crime. We are continuing the additions of country's, to the "environmental crime by country" section, Reviewing and editing text that violates the neutral point of view criteria, revising pieces of the overall organization of the article, and adding new research and sources to expand valuable information that relates to this topic. (Wiki7839 22:28, November 9, 2020.)

2 template messages were added in the enforcement section, recommending to review the project pages that were linked. This section could use review of Wikipedia's NPOV criteria. Examples: Phrasing such as; "In many cases", "As a result of weak environmental legislation", "various enforcement methods", is a mixture of unsupported attributes and promoting a particular point of view. (Wiki7839 22:28, November 9, 2020.)