Talk:Flowstone

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Caves Earth sciences portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caves, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of caving and cave articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. Geology Low‑importance Geology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

wow that picture is phallic —Preceding unsigned comment added by Superdupergc (talk • contribs) 2007-05-18T22:45:33

Merger proposal

Cave onyx is described as a regional term for flowstone. The material should be merged into a section of this article leaving behind a redirect. --Kleopatra (talk) 00:14, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Kleopatra (talk) 00:18, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Looks like the same thing, so go for it. --DanielCD (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• If it is the same thing, I totally Support the redirect, since as a caver I hear the word "flowstone" a lot, but have never heard the term "cave onyx" before. That's what you get for living in lava tube country. Leitmotiv (talk) 05:53, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, it would add an interesting facet to the flowstone article, it doesn't appear to stand up well as an article by itself. Fattonyni (talk) 12:52, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. It is a very old, regional term and should be mentioned in the more general article. WTucker (talk) 14:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]