| Geography (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which was archived on 9 May 2025. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Geography article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives (index): 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
| This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The geography subfields are underrepresented
[edit]The geography subfields are quite underrepresented in this article. For example, the human geography section is 4 sentences and a gallery. ChaoticVermillion (converse, contribs) 02:18, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- There has been a lot of talk on this within the various pages. The Technical geography section would be about the amount of text I'd like to see for physical and human, however I'm not sure if replacing the gallery with text would be very useful. People can click the links if they want the content, rephrasing it would blow the page up without actually giving an adequate discussion. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 02:32, 4 November 2025 (UTC)