Wiki Article

Talk:Good Old Neon

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:09, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Source: Mathematics in Postmodern American Fiction, page 262: "In the short story this strategy suggests a performance of the failure of language, whether natural or symbolic, to faithfully represent the infinitely dense temporality of the moment of death." Oblivion, page 167: "The thing is that it turns out that logical symbolism really would be the best way to express it [dying]"
Created by ALittleClass (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

ALittleClass (talk) 17:22, 3 August 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.
Overall: Article was newly-expanded at the time of nomination, and is 995 words (5,939 characters) long. It is fully sourced, with the acceptable exception of the plot summary. It is neutral, balancing the positive and negative reviews. It is free from plagiarism, with Earwig only flagging clearly attributed quotes. Both hooks are cited and interesting to the average reader. This is the nominator's first nomination, so no QPQ is required. My only issue with the article is that its lead is too short to provide an accessible overview of the subject, but this does not affect DYK criteria. Grnrchst (talk) 17:17, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]