Talk:GreenWay

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Sydney Low‑importance Australia portal GreenWay is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^What's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Cycling Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Environment Low‑importance Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Transport Low‑importance Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Urban studies and planning Low‑importance Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians from or interested in Australia may be able to help!

On 5 January 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved to GreenWay (Sydney). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Page Title

I'm not an expert on page titles to avoid ambiguity, but I was wondering whether it would be better to rename the page GreenWay (Sydney) to better differentiate it, since Greenway itself is a page and there are large numbers of urban parks called "xxxx Greenway" around the world. Johnorchard (talk) 03:51, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I created the article with the idea that the only disambiguation really needed to be capital letters because it was different enough to exisiting titles, but I get how unclear and imprecise (WP:PRECISE) that is. It would be a good idea to gauge support for a name change through a requested move. Qwerty123M (talk) 00:49, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 January 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 05:10, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

---

GreenWay → GreenWay (Sydney)GreenWay (Sydney) – @Johnorchard gave me the idea to request this move. When I was creating this page, I focused on using the official name for this trail and not using a disambiguation; but as per WP:OFFICIALNAME, we don't have to use the name this trail is officially known as. The current title is not entirely clear and a possible violation of WP:PRECISE. I was wondering whether I should boldly make this move but I think to gain consensus for a major change like this, proper practice dictates a requested move discussion should be the way forward. I think this is a very good title to use as it is less ambiguous than the current title where only capitalisation resolves conflict between other location names. Qwerty123M (talk) 11:23, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose, current title is clear and precise, any disambiguity can be dealt with via a hatnote. Kormaonl (talk) 21:03, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose this appears to be the only use with a capital "W" and in the singular as well as 1 word. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:19, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Cycling, WikiProject Sydney, WikiProject Environment, WikiProject Transport, and WikiProject Urban studies and planning have been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPath^talk 06:45, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose. The capital "W" in the middle is an example of WP:SMALLDETAILS. It seems that more readers searching for this topic are more likely going to deliberately type that capital "W" versus others who might type that in by mistake. Zzyzx11 (talk) 22:18, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.