Soliton

[edit]

The seems to be a very rare nonceword which nobody is going to understand.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 04:10, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Homemaking?

[edit]

Dear writer,

Homemaking seems in your article a rare business. I think that it is the managing of any organization to keep the internal structure "sound and alive". Strange remark???

Regards,

J.P. Clifford 85.149.24.135 (talk) 16:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 January 2021 and 19 March 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Henshena. Peer reviewers: Jaidajeter.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2019 and 2 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wellcaffeinated109. Peer reviewers: Bear606, Bear102938.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:48, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HomeMaker Group

[edit]

HomeMakerär ett svenskt proptech-bolag (property technology) och grundades 2015, med syftet att digitalisera fastighets- och byggbranschen. Med fler än 60 kunder i Skandinavien, fler än 1000 utförda projekt och 45 000 bostäder i systemen är den en av branschledarna inom tillvals- och eftermarknadshantering. Företaget erbjuder en digitaliserad kundresa, från kundens köpintresse till ärendehantering, med lösningar som nyttjas av bostadsköpare, bostadsutvecklare/projektutvecklare, totalentreprenörer och fastighetsägare/förvaltare.

Idag ingår HomeMaker i Hydda Group, en koncern som samlar proptechbolag med tjänster riktade mot fastighetsbranschen. Tillsammans med Parkando, digitala parkeringslösningar, och Elbilio, mobiliteslösningar, erbjuds fastighetsägare och fastighetsutvecklare en bredare portfölj av digitala lösningar.

https://homemaker.io/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.255.245.26 (talk) 12:00, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Housekeeping into Homemaking

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To distinguish rather than merge, but no consensus on the nature of the distinction; discussion stale for more than 6 months. Klbrain (talk) 16:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In its current form, it is not clear how the subject of Housekeeping is exclusive or different than the subject at Homemaking. The latter almost seems as though a few sections were taken from the former and reworded in a way to make the sections look like a distinct topic. In addition, both of these articles have various redirects that target then which could reasonably target either article. It just seems like unnecessary confusion to have two article for subject with such a blurry, almost nonexistent distinction between them. Steel1943 (talk) 16:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment for what it's worth, I do see the closed merge proposal above, but the concern could be resolved by staying in Homemaking something along the lines of "The US term for this is housekeeping" or something of the like. It's kind of like how in the United States, a handbag is usually called a "purse", and the article explains this; just because a subject has a different name in another country doesn't make it a separate subject. Steel1943 (talk) 16:43, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Homemeaking is domestic housekeeping, it has a much narrower scope. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 07:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Homemaking is an exclusively US term - or anyway not used in the UK. Even apart from this, as User:Pbsouthwood says above, Housekeeping is the broader term, & any merge should be to that. Johnbod (talk) 15:10, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • The questions then are (a) whether Homemaking is a subset of domestic housekeeping, in which case it could in principle, be merged into housekeeping as a section, or (b) Homemaking largely overlaps but has some scope that is not shared with housekeeping, in which case it should not be merged, and the differences should be mentioned and if necessary, explained. If they are the same thing that should be stated in the lead, and Domestic housekeeping could be a redirect to Homemaking. I have skimmed through the discussions and comments on this page, and there seem to be quite a few opinions unsupported by evidence scattered around, but at face value, this article is big enough to stand alone, and a merge would grossly unbalance Housekeeping, so I don't support a merge. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 16:41, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • A further, but related question is whether Homemaking or Domestic housekeeping should be the title of this article, based on international breadth of usage. I am currently undecided, and do not care that much, but a decision to change should be based on evidence, not local opinion. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 17:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • I am now less undecided, see below. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 17:35, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the lead, there is an uncited claim A person in charge of the homemaking, who is not employed outside the home, in the US and Canada, is called a homemaker. This brings up a few questions about the scope and logic of the terminology. If true, then are people who have a daytime job, (or for that matter moonlighting) not to be considered to be homemakers? That would be a serious restriction, as that would mean most homemaking is being done by people who are not technically homemakers, which could cause some confusion among the English speaking world who are not North American. Some clarification and a strong verification are needed. I will see what I can find.· · · Peter Southwood (talk): 17:35, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Better just to drop "who is not employed outside the home" surely? Both articles are resolutely all about the Anglosphere anyway. Johnbod (talk) 17:41, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • My first hit was
      noun
      1) a person who manages the household of his or her own family, especially as a principal occupation.
      2)a person employed to manage a household and do household chores for others, as for the sick or elderly. [1]
    • also
      A homemaker is someone who spends a lot of time looking after their home and family. You usually use homemaker to refer to someone who does not have a job outside the home. [2]
    • and
      a person who manages a home and often raises children instead of earning money from a job [3]
    • and
      one who manages a household especially as a spouse and parent [4]
    • and
      a person who manages a home and takes care of the house and family as their main job [5]
    • and
      a wife who manages a household while her husband earns the family income [6]
    • and
      especially American English a woman who works at home cleaning and cooking etc and does not have another job [7]
    • and from Wiktionary, (US) A person who maintains the administration and upkeep of his or her residence, especially one who is not employed outside the home; one who runs the household. [8] which seems a fair average.
    • So opinions vary among the dictionaries. On average, a slight leaning toward not necessarily having no paid job.
    • So yes, I think we should drop the bit you mention, or add "usually" based on the reasonable evidence above. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 18:07, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Religious / Christian fundamentalist aspect

[edit]

Many (most?) fundamentalist Christians consider that there are biblically different roles for men and women and that the woman's role is to be a housewife / homemaker whilst the man's role is to work to 'provide for his family". This is not mentioned at all. 31.51.14.209 (talk) 21:16, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you can provide a reliable source for this statement you can add something about it yourself.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 21:48, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is the image of a vacuum cleaner that necessary?

[edit]

It's associated with housekeeping but nothing near the image really mentions vacuuming Mgjertson (talk) 17:05, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Commentary on Annie Swan’s notes

[edit]

I don’t think this is something to include on the article, but I do think it’s worth bringing up SOMEWHERE. The way I interpret Annie Swan’s “proud tradwife” words is less her saying “this is where a woman belongs” and more “this is where we are, so have pride in your work”

what she said could really be taken as “evidence” of women’s “rightful place”. In reality, it’s just idealism - romanticizing a forced scenario to make it sound appealing. Idealists do it all the time, with “traditional” or nostalgic imagery - paint a rosy image to appeal to people. ~2025-37898-77 (talk) 16:34, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]