This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Intersectionality article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 6 months

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sociology High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Feminism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Gender studies Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles Cleanup : edit to see Collaborate : see /Collaboration Copyedit : edit to see Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender Expand : edit to see Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes Merge : edit to see Notability : edit to see NPOV : edit to see Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies Split : History of feminism Stubs : see Gender studies stubs Translate : see /translation Update : edit to see Verify : Riot grrrl Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention Discrimination High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Psychology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for merging with Triple oppression on 14 October 2018. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was No consensus.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: Atewologun, Doyin (28 August 2018). "Intersectionality Theory and Practice". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.48. Bhopal, Kalwant; Preston, John, eds. (2012). Intersectionality and "Race" in Education. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-136-62899-3. Burge, Amy (2018). "Intersectionality". In Robertson, Judy; et al. (eds.). EqualBITE: Gender equality in higher education. Brill. pp. 85–88. doi:10.1163/9789463511438_016. ISBN 978-94-6351-143-8. Collins, Patricia Hill; Bilge, Sirma (2020). Intersectionality (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. ISBN 978-1-5095-3967-3. Duran, Antonio; Jones, Susan R. (2020). "Intersectionality". In Casey, Zachary A. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Critical Whiteness Studies in Education. Brill. pp. 310–320. doi:10.1163/9789004444836_041. ISBN 978-90-04-44483-6. Falcón, Sylvanna M. (2009). "Intersectionality". In O'Brien, Jodi (ed.). Encyclopedia of Gender and Society. SAGE Publications. pp. 467–469. ISBN 978-1-4129-0916-7. Hancock, Ange-Marie (2016). Intersectionality : an intellectual history. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1993-7038-2.\ Howard, Judith A.; Renfrow, Daniel G. (2014). "Intersectionality". In McLeod, Jane D.; Lawler, Edward J.; Schwalbe, Michael (eds.). Handbook of the Social Psychology of Inequality. Springer Netherlands. pp. 95–121. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9002-4_5. ISBN 978-94-017-9002-4. "Intersectionality". ScienceDirect. Elsevier. Archived from the original on 26 November 2021.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2022 and 13 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Juliannamurga (article contribs). Peer reviewers: J.bust0s23.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2025 and 10 May 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yz1141, Ananyamunjal, Zjl10 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Turtlesdownunder, Taliazam, An9000, Edu-student-123.

— Assignment last updated by Liliput000 (talk) 17:26, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article is illustrated with a four-set Venn diagram. From a mathematical point of view I love this diagram; too few people are aware how to show all 16 combinations of four sets in a Venn diagram! However, this is widely beside the point in this article. A three-set Venn diagram like this one would make the point just as well - and that means, it would make it far better, as far more people would be familiar with it. Nø (talk) 17:24, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, showing a Venn diagram that people are less familiar with, and is just as correct, would give them something new to take in, and therefore is better, in my opinion. Lova Falk (talk) 05:41, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly disagree. Wikipedia is educational (among other things), but we should not aim at teaching a rather exotic mathematical thing is an article on a sociological subject to which it is irrelevant. What I'm describing as exotic and irrelevant is not four sets intersecting, as such, but it is representing this in a Venn diagram. It's not rocket science, you might say, but it is not well known either, even among the mathematically literate. The point the diagram is meant to make, in relation to the subject matter, is made just as clearly with a three-set Venn diagram, which will be way more familiar to a vast majority of readers. Nø (talk) 20:53, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, readers are not served by the more complex and less recognizable Venn diagram. In the worst case, the presence of a novel, colorful, abstract shape could be misinterpreted literally as an emblem/logo/symbol for the concept of intersectionality. A commonly used visual is an Euler diagram showing overlapping circles/ellipses/stadiums annotated with examples of factors of privilege/discrimination (gender, race, class, sexuality, disability, to pick five) would be helpful to readers. –RoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ (talk • stalk) 02:26, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that a diagram with specific examples of factors could make sense, but on the other hand, the idea of intersectionality is not limited to any specific factors. For now, I'll replace the diagram with the three-set generic Venn diagram. Nø (talk) 07:06, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, you have an ally. 🙂 Lova Falk (talk) 12:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2025 and 8 December 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BlopBlop56, KitriLake (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by DrResearchMethods (talk) 16:14, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed a problem with the Political section of the Repsonses section. It gives undue weight to critism of intersectionality. WP:NPOV. PipFowler (talk) 17:50, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Fixit. - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 22:13, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okie dokie PipFowler (talk) 22:15, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]