Talk:Jolly Super

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Women Do News Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women Do News, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Journalism Low‑importance Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. England Low‑importance England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

( Comment or view )

( Article history links:

• Jolly Super
• Jolly Super Too
• Jolly Superlative

)

• ... that volumes of Jilly Cooper's journalism were variously described as "prattling pieces", delivering "a snigger a minute", and "immensely witty"? Source: 1. "prattling pieces"=https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-northern-echo-north-yorkshire-ed/182959260/ 2. "snigger a minute"=https://www.newspapers.com/article/birmingham-evening-mail-a-snigger-a-minu/184990360/ 3. "immensely witty"=https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-sydney-morning-herald-book-notes/186528190/
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hanoikids
  • Comment: *QPQ2=Template:Did you know nominations/Lake Superior agate
• QPQ3=Template:Did you know nominations/Nnena Kalu

Created by Lajmmoore (talk). Number of QPQs required: 3. Nominator has 157 past nominations.

Lajmmoore (talk) 22:19, 13 December 2025 (UTC).[reply]

• I take, will review in the next 24 hours. (I know exactly what I'm spending this on.)--Launchballer 22:24, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lajmmoore: Long enough, new enough. QPQs done and Earwig is clean. No reason why any of them would deserve a maintenance template. As for the hook, I'd substitute "immensely witty" for "having a "souffle touch"" unless you have another idea?--Launchballer 01:55, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1: ... that volumes of Jilly Cooper's journalism were variously described as "prattling pieces", delivering "a snigger a minute", and having a "souffle touch"?

That's a good call, thank you! Lajmmoore (talk) 07:16, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I must ask for another reviewer.--Launchballer 13:11, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ALT2... that volumes of one writer's journalism were variously described as "prattling pieces", delivering "a snigger a minute", and "immensely witty"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lajmmoore (talk • contribs) 15:05, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Following on from above, both ALT1 and ALT2 seem fine. Personally, I have a slight preference for ALT1 ("souffle touch" is hook-y click-bait). Unless I'm missing something else about the process here, this looks good to go. -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 18:50, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]