Wiki Article
Talk:Liquid breathing
Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Liquid breathing article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives (index): 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Liquid breathing.
|
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 June 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Theoretical or practical?
[edit]This article doesn't make it clear. Kortoso (talk) 21:48, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Liquid breathing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516182627/http://www.davidszondy.com/future/underwater/menfish.htm to http://davidszondy.com/future/underwater/menfish.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:12, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
How?
[edit]how do you breathe it in? Anytime I accidently inhale water, I cough and choke 2601:1C0:4D7F:D7A0:705F:C903:B0A7:4A8E (talk) 01:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Proposed summary for technical prose
[edit]I've been using Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental large language model to create summaries for the most popular articles with {{Technical}} templates. This article, Liquid breathing, has such a template above the entire article. Here is the paragraph summary at grade 5 reading level which Gemini 2.5 Pro suggested:
- Liquid breathing is when an animal or person that usually breathes air breathes a special liquid full of oxygen instead. This special liquid can carry oxygen to the body and take away the waste gas called carbon dioxide, just like air does. Scientists think liquid breathing might help treat people with very serious lung or heart problems, especially sick babies. It has also been suggested for helping people dive very deep underwater or travel in space where there are strong forces. Although it has been tested, it is still an experimental idea and not commonly used yet.
While I have read and may have made some modifications to that summary, I am not going to add it to the article because I want other editors to review, revise if appropriate, and add it instead. This is an experiment with a few dozen articles initially to see how these suggestions are received, and after a week or two, I will decide how to proceed. Thank you for your consideration. Cramulator (talk) 12:58, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
I am retracting this and the other LLM-generated suggestions due to clear negative consensus at the Village Pump. I will be posting a thorough postmortem report in mid-April to the source code release page. Thanks to all who commented on the suggestions both negatively and positively, and especially to those editors who have manually addressed the overly technical cleanup issue on six, so far, of the 68 articles where suggestions were posted. Cramulator (talk) 01:39, 5 April 2025 (UTC)