Former featured articleMinnesota is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 11, 2007.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 17, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
July 12, 2006Good article nomineeListed
October 30, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
November 30, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
November 10, 2020Featured article reviewDemoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 11, 2010, and May 11, 2013.
Current status: Former featured article

Change flag

[edit]

Change the flag to the new one. JamesonPi (talk) 21:41, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: The flag has not been officially changed yet. Wracking talk! 21:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How about now 2600:1014:B083:B84D:0:16:6AFE:2501 (talk) 13:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Effective date of new flag change

[edit]

May 11, 2024 is the effective date.

Previous discussion mentions two dates for the new flag change, both based upon press articles. This is probably based upon Wikipedia's preference for interpretation of original materials. However, to resolve the conflicting dates, I point out that the Flag of Minnesota article links to the statute which states the official effective date.[1] SEWilco (talk) 18:17, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Scalable" map hard to read, doesn't zoom in

[edit]

The map has a lot of odd character spacing in the place names, making some of them hard to read; for example, St Croix River looks more like S. Crd xRiver. Also, hovering over the map turns the cursor into a + symbol, which normally means you can click to zoom in, but clicking zooms the image out instead. 2601:642:C201:210:D473:4D77:27B5:BE8E (talk) 01:57, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with Opening Section

[edit]

There are several issues with the opening section, particularly around sourcing, which is somewhat poor in several paragraphs.

For example the article lists Minnesota as “one of the richest states in GDP and per capita income.” This claim isn’t sourced. Per Wiki Minnesota ranks 20th and 19th in GDP and GDP/capita and 13th in per capita income. This language feels a little fanciful. Mvdltn (talk) 05:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 April 2025

[edit]

Under Economy > Industry and Commerce, the sentence

"The state is the nation's largest producer of sugar beets, sweet corn, and peas for processing, and farm-raised turkeys."

should be changed to

"The state is the nation's largest producer of sugar beets, sweet corn, peas for processing, and farm-raised turkeys."

Thanks. Tattooed Shannon (talk) 11:49, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Aston305 (talk) 14:40, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Aston305 It's time to lift the protection, as important information about the rampant fraud needs to be added. ~2025-35113-26 (talk) 18:40, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not my job or my prerogative, sorry Aston305 (complain/compliment) 18:55, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adding “Minnesotan English” to the spoken languages tab

[edit]

I propose adding the North Central dialect under English in the spoken language section as it is the dialect spoken in Minnesota, additionally it should be labeled “Minnesotan English” because that is what it is known as in Minnesota. Kahlo157 (talk) 16:46, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Minnestoa has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 8 § Minnestoa until a consensus is reached. Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 20:49, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rampant fraud

[edit]

Hi, I would like to know why Wikipedia doesn't allow the information about the fraud to be included in this article ~2025-35113-26 (talk) 18:39, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's on the governor's article...Tim Walz#Feeding Our Future fraud. --Magnolia677 (talk) 19:01, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There's an article about the major fraud case Feeding Our Future on Wikipedia, and if it feels appropriate to create a more general article concerning fraud in recent years, and reliable sourcing supports its existence, you might benefit from creating an account to start an article that Wikipedians can all collaborate on. This is not a current events page; it's for general encyclopedic information about the state, and this news item might fall victim to what we call recentism and not warrant inclusion in this specific location. ~Malvoliox (talk | contribs) 19:55, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So are you going to answer my question? Why doesn't Wikipedia allow the information about the fraud to be included in this article?
Information from this article shouldn't be banned just because some info is scattered around in other articles. ~2025-35113-26 (talk) 12:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't "banned" from this article and I don't know what gives you that impression.
But Minnesota has almost 168 years of history as a state. The fraud scandals are still ongoing events, and it is not yet clear the impact they will have on the state's history in the long term, so now isn't the time to cover them here. They are clearly having a major impact on the Walz administration, which is why they're covered in that article as well as the dedicated one linked above. --Sable232 (talk) 15:42, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Well, can I edit this article OR has anyone added the info yet?
No? Then how is it not banned information? ~2025-35113-26 (talk) 17:02, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]