Wiki Article

Talk:NATO

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Good articleNATO has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
In the newsOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 13, 2006Good article nomineeListed
August 9, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
May 26, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
September 6, 2013Good article reassessmentKept
October 20, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
March 10, 2022Good article reassessmentKept
August 2, 2023Good article reassessmentKept
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on March 27, 2020.
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 4, 2004, November 21, 2004, April 4, 2005, April 4, 2006, April 4, 2007, April 4, 2008, April 4, 2009, April 4, 2010, April 4, 2011, April 4, 2013, April 4, 2016, April 4, 2017, April 4, 2019, April 4, 2020, April 4, 2022, April 4, 2024, and April 4, 2025.
Current status: Good article

New Infobox Map(s)

[edit]

Hi, I think the map currently in the infobox deserves an update, so I created a new one with more accurate and up-to-date borders that aligns with the conventions on orthographic map projections, plus different colors indicating the territories of member states that aren't actually covered by the treaty (e.g., French Guiana). I also created another map to focus on the European member states, which I think deserves a spot on the infobox as well.

From L-R: Current orthographic map; proposed orthographic map; proposed new European locator map

Qbox673 (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fabulous, thank you, those are great. The current map has some pretty atrocious cartographic issues. You can see in the topic above from September, I went into the SVG to fix deviations in the Iraqi border and add Eritrea, which had been somehow forgotten. As I mentioned then, zooming into it shows just how simplified it is, but even that degree of simplification on coastlines is inconsistent in different spots. So yes, I'll put both of those maps you made into the infobox with a switcher toggle. Patrick Neil, oѺ/Talk 19:19, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So no one actually minds that the new map of NATO splits up the internationally recognized territories of Ukraine and Moldova?164.10.46.62 (talk) 12:45, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NATO 2% of GDP spending graphs

[edit]

The financial contribution of each member of NATO has been a topic of interest for many, including the historical failure of many NATO members to meet the NATO guideline of 2% of GDP spending. Suggest adding some graphs to show the spending and % of GDP for members including historical data to help readers understand how many countries for years failed to meet the 2% of GDP guideline. Data can be found here: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2024/6/pdf/240617-def-exp-2024-en.pdf 178.153.41.28 (talk) 16:37, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is a good idea, but the thing is, graphs need to be made by somebody who makes graphs. I personally don't. Lova Falk (talk) 06:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
there are some charts on the Member states of NATO page, which I added a few years ago, so a bit out of date now, but may help you. Maybe that page is a good one to link in the See Also section of this article. I'm not in a position to edit right now, otherwise would add it. Hope this helps! 2A02:C7C:D6CB:6300:244C:6749:3915:DCB7 (talk) 06:48, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is Australia one of the Enhanced Opportunities Partners of NATO?

[edit]

I can't find any source for counting Australia as a member of the Enhanced Opportunities Partners, nor the map in the article. Besides, in the article, Australia is counted as one of the global partner, too. 臺灣象象 (talk) 06:02, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 臺灣象象, please provide a source confirming that Australia is an Enhanced Opportunities Partner and not a Global partner. Lova Falk (talk) 07:47, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Lova Falk:Sorry, what I’m trying to say is that there are no sources for Australia being an Enhanced Opportunities Partner, but it could have been incorrectly added to the article. Taiwanese Elephant🐘(talk|contribs) 07:53, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Aha! Taiwanese Elephant🐘 I am sorry I missunderstood. I found a source for Australia (and New Zealand) being global partners of Nato and I added that source to the article. Does that answer your concern? Lova Falk (talk) 08:04, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please add

[edit]

Chief of Staff of U.S. Army Europe is Markus Laubenthal (Germany). He is the first non-American in this post.--Photographer's Box (talk) 17:25, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Photographer's Box, U.S. Army Europe is not even mentioned in this article. It seems WP:UNDUE. If you disagree, please tell me. Friendly, Lova Falk (talk) 07:45, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Frankly, I disagree. The Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) is the military headquarters of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) Allied Command Operations (ACO) that commands all NATO operations worldwide. SHAPE is situated in the village of Casteau, near Mons, Belgium. Mr. Laubenthal is the Chief of SHAPE.--Photographer's Box (talk) 06:49, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, please tell me exactly which sentence you would like me to add where in the text. Lova Falk (talk) 07:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 August 2025

[edit]

Change for French name "Organisation du traité de l'Atlantique nord" to "Organisation du traité de l'Atlantique Nord" - Nord is capitalized in translators Guy with a KickTALK 23:31, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done tony 01:16, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:40, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]