Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 May 2024

[edit]

Change the reference link for 13 to this URL instead: https://apnews.com/united-states-government-e5c04516ee3c40d9800768573e2f7a8e

The current link is dead, but this is likely the same wire copy filed by the AP reporter, Josh Lederman, and has the same quotes referenced. Paul Brescia (talk) 10:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Donehako9 (talk) 07:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 11 December 2024

[edit]
Haskeymorrison (talk) 01:13, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The British Mandate of Palestine also included modern-day Jordan. I feel this is important to mention.

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 07:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One-state reality should be a redirect to a section in Israeli apartheid rather than here

[edit]

Right now, "one-state reality" is bolded in the introductory paragraph, but the one-state reality is a framework for understanding the status quo and is not directly related to proposed solutions, such as the one-state solution. The "one-state reality" as described by Michael Barnett (see this article) is that what currently exists in Israel is apartheid and that "what matters is that the apartheid label accurately describes the facts on the ground and offers the beginnings of a road map to change them." The connection that Bennett draws with solutions is specifically that the "one-state reality" is a direct challenge to the Two-state solution because "...this one-state reality contrasts with the illusory idea that there is a democratic Israel, however flawed, that is a distinct entity from the area under its military occupation since 1967."

David Remnick's 2014 New Yorker article (the one currently used in this article) uses the phrase "one-state reality" and refers to the status quo (of 2014). Again, the "one-state reality" is offered as a critique of the two-state solution through quoting several people who dismiss the two-state solution.

So basically, I propose that "One-state reality" is redirected to a newly written section of Israeli apartheid that would explain how scholars have used "One-state reality" to discuss apartheid and critique the two-state solution. JasonMacker (talk) 01:17, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JasonMacker, ideally we should have an article called One-state reality (term), we should describe the usage of that term. Then One-state reality can redirect to either One-state reality (term) or Israeli apartheid.VR (Please ping on reply) 22:26, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 20 May 2025

[edit]

Add [failed verification] because the link redirects to irrelevant page and [citation needed]:

Diff:

In 2011, a poll by Stanley Greenberg and the Palestinian Center for Public Opinion and sponsored by the [[Israel Project]] revealed that 61% of Palestinians reject a two state solution, while 34% said they accepted it. 66% said the Palestinians’ real goal should be to start with a two-state solution but then move to it all being one Palestinian state.
+
In 2011, a poll by Stanley Greenberg and the Palestinian Center for Public Opinion and sponsored by the [[Israel Project]] revealed that 61% of Palestinians reject a two state solution, while 34% said they accepted it.<sup class="noprint Inline-Template " style="white-space:nowrap;">[<i>[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|<span title="The material near this tag failed verification of its source citation(s).">failed verification</span>]]</i>]</sup> 66% said the Palestinians’ real goal should be to start with a two-state solution but then move to it all being one Palestinian state.<sup class="noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact" style="white-space:nowrap;">[<i>[[Wikipedia:Citation needed|<span title="This claim needs references to reliable sources.">citation needed</span>]]</i>]</sup>

Throat0390 (talk) 20:12, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

URL fixed, not sure how the url for a different article got there but should be the right article now. That article does cover all the info mentioned in the paragraph Cannolis (talk) 20:46, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Hoffman, Gil (2011-07-15). "6 in 10 Palestinians reject 2-state solution, survey finds". Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 2016-04-12.
  2. ^ Hoffman, Gil (2011-07-15). "6 in 10 Palestinians reject 2-state solution, survey finds". Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 2016-04-12.