Talk:Propaganda

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Propaganda article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 2 months

	Propaganda is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 1, 2004.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 19, 2004 Refreshing brilliant prose Kept November 30, 2006 Featured article review Demoted
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 4, 2014. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Propaganda followed up his Excellent album with his fourth solo release, Crimson Cord?
Current status: Former featured article

This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Journalism Top‑importance Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Marketing & Advertising Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale. Media Top‑importance Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Media To-do List: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite NPOV : Content (media and publishing) Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper Other : Answer requests for comments Politics High‑importance Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Intelligence C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Intelligence task force Philosophy: Social and political Mid‑importance Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Social and political philosophy

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: "Propaganda and politics". University of South Florida. September 10, 2004.

Wiki Education assignment: Criticism as Praxis

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 February 2022 and 23 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Blakemurray7 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Sarvesh Nyachhyon, JoeyCalzo.

Lets turn this into a "good article"

What are some ideas for turning this article from a vital C-class article to a GA? Or at least, a B-class article? Philomathes2357 (talk) 07:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to pitch in @Philomathes2357. The first thought that comes to mind is to start by making the article more global and less Western-focused, including in the examples and images. Superb Owl (talk) 21:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many of these examples are not either true propaganda or ineffectual

Posters shown were examples of advertising rather than true propaganda. True propaganda is convincingly able to engineer consent of the mass population. Merely being racist or stereotypical or even nationalistic does not make them true propaganda 97.120.210.206 (talk) 09:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The New Propaganda War

These are excellent articles about propaganda (a MUST read!) dealing with MAGA's war against truth, freedom, and democracy. It is carried on by elements of Trumpism (MAGA, GOP, Trump) and Trump's autocratic dictator friends.

• "The New Propaganda War"^[1]
• Oliver Darcy's commentary about it: "Journalist sounds alarm on dangers of propaganda, calling it 'one of the worst crises for American democracy this century'"^[2]

The refs are fully usable as is. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how to use these sources in this article. Perhaps they could be added to the "history" section. That whole section is sub-par, and should certainly have more information about post-Cold War propaganda besides a cursory mention of, of all things, the Yugoslav wars.

However, I'm not convinced that Anne Applebaum's opinion about propaganda is due in this article at all. A stronger argument could be made that her commentary is due in another article, like History of propaganda, Propaganda in the United States, Propaganda in Russia, or Propaganda through media. Philomathes2357 (talk) 06:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it would, as always for any source, depend on how her article is used. Otherwise, as she is an eminent, widely-published, and multi-award-winning subject matter expert on the topic, I don't understand the objection. Check out her bio at Anne Applebaum. It would be hard to find a better source. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't object to using the articles at all. It's just not immediately obvious to me how the sources can be woven into this article as it exists currently. My first thought, like I said, would be the "History" section, which is woefully lacking and could use a lot more information about post-Cold War propaganda. How would you go about incorporating these? Philomathes2357 (talk) 05:48, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

1. Applebaum, Anne (May 6, 2024). "The New Propaganda War". The Atlantic. Retrieved May 8, 2024.
2. Darcy, Oliver (May 8, 2024). "Journalist sounds alarm on dangers of propaganda, calling it 'one of the worst crises for American democracy this century'". CNN. Retrieved May 8, 2024.

Bisotun Inscription and Propaganda

Is the Bisotun Inscription still regarded as a piece of propaganda? I found a more rcent journal article than the current source that argues this is due to biased scholarship. Also note that the current wikipedia page for the inscription does not mention the propaganda debate. Is there a more appropriate example of early propaganda which is less contentious?

The Bīsotūn Inscription - A Jeopardy of Achaemenid History: https://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1473187&dswid=-8136 24.206.69.90 (talk) 20:42, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above source notes in its own abstract that it is presenting a revisionist view that contradicts the general views of the field. Generally, the appropriateness of including such claims on Wikipedia depends on the impact that they managed to have on the field; do subsequent publications regarding Achaemenid history defer to and/or cite Ahmadi's paper, or do they continue to uphold the prior dominant view? I wasn't able to find any evidence of citations to Ahmadi in a quick Google Scholar search. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:24, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]