[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quentin Fottrell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notable enough for Wikipedia?

[edit]

[Article subject notability questioned.] Taibhseoir (talk) 07:27, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edits reveal misuse of sources

[edit]

Today's edits did not add material without sources. It simply examined content, placed it properly with regard to usual Wikipedia section headings, and in so doing, revealed the fact that citations in the earlier article were repeatedly misused.

Most egregiously, citations were placed at ends of sentences and paragraphs, purportedly as content sources, when the citations did not cover most, if any of the content that preceded them. In one particular case, a QF-authored WSJ article related to aspects of the Irish experience following the rise of Ireland as the Celtic Tiger was placed after a compound sentence stating QF's place of birth and two relevant educational institutions—none of which appear in the cited WSJ.

This edit garnered a bot-response, possible addition of unsourced content. But the opposite is true. The edit hones to WP:VERIFY, and revealed repeated cases of WP:VERIFY violations.

In short, the article is a personal essay on the title subject, mostly written from WP:OR and personal knowledge, and/or drawing from sources without attribution. (If the content it contains can be shown true, it is nevertheless, then, plagiarised.)

Logging editors are invited to carefully review today's edits, and to make bolder edits than we were willing to make. Signed, former logging editors of longstanding, with tens of thousands of earlier edits, who still look in. 98.223.85.159 (talk) 20:16, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]