Talk:Sinosphere

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sinosphere article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Languages High‑importance Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. China Top‑importance China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. East Asia (defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct. Korea High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: Victor Mair (November 8, 2012). "Sinophone and Sinosphere". Language Log.

On 6 May 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from East Asian cultural sphere to Sinosphere. The result of the discussion was moved.

Mongolia

Mongolia is also a part of the Sinosphere, yet not represented in the main map. Should we amend this? 203.46.132.214 (talk) 03:45, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly not, if you actually read the article. Remsense ‥ 论 04:00, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Different colors?

Could we maybe use different colors to represent "how much" culturally linked they are the Chinese civilization? I could definitely make one JingJongPascal (talk) 13:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, that would serve no purpose, and would frankly miscommunicate whatever you actually wanted to visualize with that.

I wish we didn't use any maps in this article given they are totally unnecessary: seeing colored state boundaries communicates nothing to the reader that a plain list of polities or locales doesn't. Remsense ‥ 论 14:04, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

圈 khuyên

圈 is read in Vietnamese as khuyên, 驅 khu 圓 viên -> uyên 切 thiết. Khuyên is the reading used for 'circle'. Quyển is only used with the meaning 'pen; sty' or the surname. Lachy70 (talk) 20:57, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nguyễn Tuấn Cường, the director of Institute of Hán-Nôm Studies also comments on the misreading of the character 圈.

Vậy nên các từ khí quyển, sinh quyển đều là đọc nhầm riết thành đúng mà thôi. Lẽ ra là sinh khuyên (shengquan), khí khuyên (qiquan), nhưng giờ ai nói vậy thì là ngớ cmn ngẩn. Ngôn ngữ là ước định tục thành. Còn cái “văn hoá khuyên” là từ mới, cần được đọc đúng từ đầu.

So, it turns out that words like “khí quyển” (atmosphere) and “sinh quyển” (biosphere) are just persistent misreadings that became accepted. Originally, they would have been sinh khuyên (生圈, shengquan) and khí khuyên (氣圈, qiquan), but saying it like that today would make you sound ridiculously out of place. Language is conventional; usage becomes norm. But this new term “văn hoá khuyên” needs to be read correctly from the start. Lachy70 (talk) 21:04, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Too late, there is no comming back. Meigyoku Thmn (💬🧩) 08:19, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I fell asleep the Qing damage to the Sinosphere should be mentioned.

One of the main reasons that the Sinosphere lost influence was because of the Qing dynasty wich was a manchu dynasty that banned chinese clothing headgear and rituals this alienated the reat of eas asia with Japn veiwing it self as the inheritore of Hua culture while Korea veiwed itself as little China both viewing China as haveing been corrupted and stopped looking to it as a advanced cultureal model. Only Veitnam still respected China wich is why they adoped more Manchu styled clothing with Pipa collars. 2603:8001:8446:6EBB:C2D6:FC5D:EF7E:DA3F (talk) 11:50, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]