Wiki Article
Talk:Steve Bannon
Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Steve Bannon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 4 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
"appeared to some to be"
[edit]the phrase "appeared to some as a nazi salute" seems uneccesarily ambiguous. It implies that only a small subgroup of people see it that way when it was widely seen as and reported as such, especially in the context of it being right after Elon Musk's similar actions. Neutrality is important but no need to attempt to be so neutral we downplay something that blatant. "appeared to be a nazi salute" or even "appeared to many to be a nazi salute" would be more appropriate. Aradiades (talk) 01:58, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- "Some" is WP:WEASEL. Probably "some" editors here will argue for changing the phrase into "according to some sources, allegedly appeared to some as a nazi salute". --Hob Gadling (talk) 09:57, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
- Support "appeared to many to be a nazi salute" Czarking0 (talk) 15:59, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
- As shown in the yellow box at the top of the WP:WEASEL guideline section, "many" is also considered a weasel word. More sourced specifics are needed. Who are these 'some' or 'many', or possibly, what reliably measured fraction of viewers saw it that way? ... —ADavidB 19:16, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
- we can also call a spade a spade this is a good use of many Czarking0 (talk) 00:26, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
- As shown in the yellow box at the top of the WP:WEASEL guideline section, "many" is also considered a weasel word. More sourced specifics are needed. Who are these 'some' or 'many', or possibly, what reliably measured fraction of viewers saw it that way? ... —ADavidB 19:16, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
Picture of Bannon with Jeffrey Epstein
[edit]Do they have any free public picture of Bannon with Jeffrey Epstein?? that could be used for this page.Muaza Husni (talk) 05:07, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
Links to Epstein
[edit]It turns out Mr. Bannon also had a close relationship with the infamous Epstein. He directly consulted him in emails and entertained the idea of bringing down Pope Francis!
Needless to say, all this new info needs to be added here ASAP. ~2026-62002-1 (talk) 19:39, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
Agree. I would add “Bannon’s entire public political persona was revealed to be a fraud by the release of The Epstein Files during early 2026.”~2026-10872-30 (talk) 06:04, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
His relationship with Epstein should have its own article
[edit]It looks pretty detailed, I say it deserves its own article VLWABC (talk) 17:13, 21 February 2026 (UTC)


