Wiki Article

Talk:Steve Bannon

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

"appeared to some to be"

[edit]

the phrase "appeared to some as a nazi salute" seems uneccesarily ambiguous. It implies that only a small subgroup of people see it that way when it was widely seen as and reported as such, especially in the context of it being right after Elon Musk's similar actions. Neutrality is important but no need to attempt to be so neutral we downplay something that blatant. "appeared to be a nazi salute" or even "appeared to many to be a nazi salute" would be more appropriate. Aradiades (talk) 01:58, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Some" is WP:WEASEL. Probably "some" editors here will argue for changing the phrase into "according to some sources, allegedly appeared to some as a nazi salute". --Hob Gadling (talk) 09:57, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support "appeared to many to be a nazi salute" Czarking0 (talk) 15:59, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
As shown in the yellow box at the top of the WP:WEASEL guideline section, "many" is also considered a weasel word. More sourced specifics are needed. Who are these 'some' or 'many', or possibly, what reliably measured fraction of viewers saw it that way? ... —ADavidB 19:16, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
we can also call a spade a spade this is a good use of many Czarking0 (talk) 00:26, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of Bannon with Jeffrey Epstein

[edit]

Do they have any free public picture of Bannon with Jeffrey Epstein?? that could be used for this page.Muaza Husni (talk) 05:07, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

It turns out Mr. Bannon also had a close relationship with the infamous Epstein. He directly consulted him in emails and entertained the idea of bringing down Pope Francis!

Needless to say, all this new info needs to be added here ASAP. ~2026-62002-1 (talk) 19:39, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. I would add “Bannon’s entire public political persona was revealed to be a fraud by the release of The Epstein Files during early 2026.”~2026-10872-30 (talk) 06:04, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

His relationship with Epstein should have its own article

[edit]

It looks pretty detailed, I say it deserves its own article VLWABC (talk) 17:13, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]