This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cricket Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cricket, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cricket articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This page has been marked as needing a taskforce assigned. WikiProject Cricket To-do list: edit history watch purge Article assessment Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details Verifiability Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards Cleanup There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format) Infoboxes Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes Cricket people Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class. Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket. Create articles for redlinks present here and here Cricket teams & countries Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe; Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams Create articles about cricket in these missing countries Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI Images Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here On this day in cricket Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries Umpires Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel Women Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours Update A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains Regularly updating cricketers' career stats. Other Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

It's worth noting that there were also timeless matches outside Test cricket, such as this one in the 1913-14 Sheffield Shield. Loganberry (Talk) 01:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is an archived report on the first test match at https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/from-the-archives-1877-mcg-hosts-the-first-international-test-match-20220310-p5a3h9.html that says that the first test match was played over four days of four hours each with nearly an hour for a lunch break:

"Great complaints were made, too, about the adjournment of the players for lunch. It was said, and very justly too, that commencing so late as one o’clock and not playing after five was little enough time in all conscience to devote to so important a match; but when nearly an hour is deducted from that it becomes really absurd."

This means that the first test match was not timeless 60.240.112.70 (talk) 00:27, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The match was advertised in advance as a four-day match. See The Argus, 10 March 1877: https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/5915492 Sammyrice (talk) 05:23, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I found the following about the second Test match, which was also a four day match:

https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/5917077?browse=ndp%3Abrowse%2Ftitle%2FA%2Ftitle%2F13%2F1877%2F03%2F29%2Fpage%2F245547%2Farticle%2F5917077

The following also says the test match in 1878-79 was also a three day match:

https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/5926825?browse=ndp%3Abrowse%2Ftitle%2FA%2Ftitle%2F13%2F1879%2F01%2F01%2Fpage%2F251294%2Farticle%2F5926825 14.203.71.54 (talk) 22:50, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Davis' (ACS Statistician of the year 2017) database notes the match conditions for each series/match and indeed they are all timeless. https://www.sportstats.com.au/zArchive/1800s/1800sseries.pdf

The 1881/82 series was advertised as timeless but essentially limited to 4 days - https://www.sportstats.com.au/zArchive/1800s/1881AE/1881AEcov.pdf

Home page of his site: https://www.sportstats.com.au/bloghome.html

His pdfs could be useful as additional sources to Lazenby in the article. DiamondIIIXX (talk) 10:18, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Added as sources in the table. DiamondIIIXX (talk) 21:16, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I also found a cricinfo source for the very first Test and the 1879 one to be timeless. https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/2000-tests-timeline-part-one-521948 DiamondIIIXX (talk) 04:06, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be more inclined to believe original newspaper adverts from 1877 than a Cricinfo article which gives no sources (the link on the words 'timeless game' just links to another Cricinfo article which itself does not say the game was timeless). FieldOfWheat (talk) 21:56, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@FieldOfWheat It's not just the Cricinfo article, it's also Lazenby's book and Charles Davis' analysis. Also having looked through the newspaper articles, they would sometimes list four days then end up playing more days to finish the game. Only two of the matches in Australia were drawn and these were due to shipping schedules. DiamondIIIXX (talk) 06:01, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As someone that isn't a expert, or even knowledgeable, in cricket, I was confused by the first line saying "the match is played until one side wins or the match is tied, with theoretically no possibility of a draw", given that in many (most?) sports a "tie" and a "draw" mean the same thing.

I understand on further searching that they have specific meanings in cricket, but perhaps some sort of clarification could be added to the lead to avoid similar confusion for others? 155.190.13.13 (talk) 04:31, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's already a link from the word "draw" to further clarification about the various results. 161.65.242.113 (talk) 08:44, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]