Former good articleUkraine was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 12, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
December 21, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
January 26, 2008Good article nomineeListed
July 12, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
August 8, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 30, 2013Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 24, 2004, August 24, 2005, August 24, 2006, August 24, 2007, August 24, 2008, August 24, 2009, August 24, 2010, August 24, 2011, August 24, 2012, August 24, 2014, August 24, 2015, and August 24, 2016.
Current status: Delisted good article


Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 November 2025

[edit]

In the 'Name' section of the article, remove the wikilink for 'name of Ukraine' (not the Main article template, keep), since it is completely redundant to have two wikilinks about the exact same topic in such close proximity. TheodoresTomfooleries (talk) 05:07, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. I don't understand where the "two wikilinks in close proximity" part comes into play. Please explain this a little better. NotJamestack (✉️|📝) 13:28, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what to tell you other than to actually look at the article, go to the 'Name' section of the article, and look with your own eyes. TheodoresTomfooleries (talk) 20:25, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That... that does not explain what you mean. Your edit request is supposed to be unambiguous. Please provide a quote of the section here. NotJamestack (✉️|📝) 20:43, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the article. This is childish. TheodoresTomfooleries (talk) 20:45, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I kindly asked you to give me the section you are talking about because I don't understand what you mean. You don't have to be rude about it. NotJamestack (✉️|📝) 20:46, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@TheodoresTomfooleries @NotJamestack  Done there's no problem and if there's any other edit requests anyone needs help with, feel free to ping. Thanks Dan the Animator 20:57, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:23, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What territory constitutes infobox Ukraine?

[edit]

Apologies I've been away from Ukraine-related content for quite a while. I would like to understand under what rationale the map of Ukraine shows Russian-occupied territory, which is a dynamic entity. That belongs in an article on the occupations/war dating back to Crimea, not on a diagram of "this represents sovereign Ukraine." That is inappropriate application of geopolitics to geography and international boundaries.

Since it's bound to come up, I would note that the case of Israel and territory it occupies—in terms of making an infobox map distinction—does not apply since not all of Israel is defined by "internationally recognized borders". (That description should be amended in the infobox.) Borders can only be established by treaty, thus the only "borders" Israel has are with Egypt and Jordan. VєсrumЬаTALK 02:01, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi VєсrumЬа. I have a hard time understanding what you mean, because the map does show Ukraine’s internationally recognised borders. The country outline and boundaries are unchanged and represent sovereign Ukraine; the colours show an overlay indicating current military occupation, not a redefinition of borders, and therefore does not mix geopolitics with geography. Lova Falk (talk) 17:43, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am simply stating that whether a fluid or static situation, showing territorial control in a war is not appropriate to the map shading of a sovereign country in its infobox. A map showing the current frontiers of Russian control is appropriate as long as editors commit to keep it updated on at least a weekly basis. VєсrumЬаTALK 03:20, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The territories shaded in light green are Russian occupied territories that have been annexed in late 2022 and proclaimed as federal subjects by Russian authorities and therefore as part of the Russian Federation (de facto), that's illegal, but maybe that's what the whole thing is supposed to signal; with the separate coloring. What do you suggest, painting the whole area dark green while there's currently a "peace talk" ongoing about land swap or territorial control over the area and what not? Swoonfed (Ping) 06:56, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Change "Russian occupied territories" to "Territory claimed but not controlled"

[edit]

It is more neutral, as in the Japan article, it says "Territory claimed but not controlled", not Russian occupied territories. South Sudan is at war with Sudan, yet it shows them "not controlling" the territories. ~2025-41695-24 (talk) 20:27, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Russia controls them if the territories are occupied, no? Territory claimed but not controlled means that they do not have a presence in the region, but they claim it. Russia clearly has a military presence in the region. ~2025-42181-90 (talk) 15:49, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Again, South Sudan is at war with Sudan. But it shows that the territory is only claimed, not controlled. There's a large military presence in the regions South Sudan and Sudan claim. ~2025-41695-24 (talk) 19:05, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

UPR listed twice

[edit]

In the "Formation" part, the UPR is listed twice at two different dates. This is kind of unclear to someone like I, who does not know the history of the UPR very well. Can a clarification be added? Արամուս (talk) 16:01, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What and why 20th Dec change please?

[edit]

@Dash9Z? Chidgk1 (talk) 15:05, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Chidgk1 I rearranged the article to be consistent with other countries articles such as placing largest cities in the Demographics section. Dash9Z (talk) 04:20, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 December 2025

[edit]

Fix Ambiguity in:

An attempt to create an independent state, the left-leaning Ukrainian People's Republic (UNR), was first announced by Mykhailo Hrushevsky, but the period was plagued by an extremely unstable political and military environment. It was first deposed in a coup d'état led by Pavlo Skoropadskyi, which yielded the Ukrainian State under the German protectorate, and the attempt to restore the UNR under the Directorate ultimately failed as the Ukrainian army was regularly overrun by other forces. The short-lived West Ukrainian People's Republic and Hutsul Republic also failed to join the rest of Ukraine.[79]

to:

An attempt to create an independent state, the left-leaning Ukrainian People's Republic (UPR), was first announced by Mykhailo Hrushevsky, but the period was plagued by an extremely unstable political and military environment. It was first deposed in a coup d'état led by Pavlo Skoropadskyi, which yielded the Ukrainian State under the German protectorate, and the attempt to restore the UPR under the Directorate ultimately failed as the Ukrainian army was regularly overrun by other forces. The short-lived West Ukrainian People's Republic and Hutsul Republic also failed to join the rest of Ukraine.[79]

-The acronym for Ukrainian People's Republic is UPR on its own page but is UNR in the text above. I believe there should be continuity to avoid confusion. Thank You. James13542 (talk) 14:33, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Day Creature (talk) 16:33, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]