Wiki Article
Talk:Vienna temple attack
Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vienna temple attack article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wikipedia is not a news website
[edit]Please remember that Wikipedia is not a news website. Lead section is structured like a news story lede and has extra information that is not included in the body of the article. I added the Lead extra info clean-up tag to highlight the issue. See MOS:LEAD to understand how the lead section should introduce and summarize an article. It should not be the sole source of the primary details that explain the notability of the article. While the first sentence should be kept, the remainder of the lead goes into too much detail for a lead, and should be moved into the body of the article, where the event can be explained in more detail. The remainder of the lead needs to be rewritten to summarize the rest of the article. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 09:41, 2 December 2023 (UTC)




