The article Acquisition of WWE by Endeavor was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 April 2023 with a consensus to merge the content into WWE. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page.
Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WWE article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Please note that this Talk page is for discussion of changes to the WWE article, not general discussion of the topic. Off-topic discussions are not appropriate for Wikipedia and will be removed.
WWE is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This professional wrestling article is a frequent target for editors to add a week-by-week synopsis of storyline events, unconfirmed information, rumors, and other content inappropriate to an encyclopedic article. Please make sure to familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not, and consider whether your additions to this article will serve to make the article larger and harder to edit for style, clarity, and grammar.
Other talk page banners
WWE was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
The claim that the WWWF quietly re-joined the NWA in 1971 is not substantiated by any evidence. Please change the sentence "Mondt left the promotion in the late 1960s and although the WWWF had previously withdrawn from the NWA, McMahon quietly re-joined in 1971." to "Mondt left the promotion in the late 1960s." Vox Pox (talk) 05:55, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This article is missing sources on many sections, hence I have added a "more sources needed" template. Also it uses sources like IMDb at places, so "better sources needed" template has been placed too.
Adding templates is just lazy...if you feel like it needs improving, no one is stopping you from doing it. Slapping a template on an article just screams of pretentiousness - "The article isn't up to my standards, but I'm too important to fix it myself, so let the 'little people' do it". Vjm827 (talk) 04:58, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What's wrong with my language? I didn't use profanity or lob any personal attacks. I just think slapping a template on an article is both lazy and snobby (and that applies to anyone who does it...not any particular editor). Snobby in that one likes to critique, and lazy in that one doesn't want to do the supposedly needed work themselves to fix it and dumps it off on others. And I have done plenty of work on this article under my former name of Vjmlhds, so don't give me "You haven't done anything on this article". And 2 reverts does not an edit war make, so that is a loaded accusation. Vjm827 (talk) 15:08, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you did contribute on another account, then I apologise. I wasn't aware. Regardless, your behaviour has been extensively rude and full of insults and chiding language since the beginning. I don't want to lose my own cool here, so you leave my no choice but to complain. Linkin Prankster (talk) 15:12, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing wrong with my behavior...just pointing out my take on templates. Being rude is name calling and personal insults - things which I have not done. Stating why I don't like a particular Wiki policy...fully within bounds. Vjm827 (talk) 15:23, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Done. Thank you. Sophocrat (talk) 18:38, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Toast1454TC 13:37, 1 October 2025 (UTC)