This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astrology Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astrology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Astrology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AstrologyWikipedia:WikiProject AstrologyTemplate:WikiProject Astrologyastrology Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Astronomy Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5.

It's been a good many years since I studied classical Greek, but I question the transliteration of ζῳδιακός, ζῴδιον and ζῷον as, respectively, "zōidiakòs", "zōidion" and "zōion". It seems to me that these should be "zōdiakòs", "zōdion" and "zōon". Why is there an "i" after the transliterated omega in each of these words? CodeTalker (talk) 03:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As there have been no responses, I have changed the transliterations to what I believe is correct. CodeTalker (talk) 17:39, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I dont get that 2601:285:0:1360:9CAF:38E7:C4C6:68CA (talk) 22:51, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CodeTalker: See iota subscript. Double sharp (talk) 15:07, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm considering a merge. Specifically of Zodiac and Western astrology. As well as Astrology and History of astrology. It's being discussed on the Astrology Talk page here.

I have looked through the majority of the referenced sources, and most of them appear to be reliable. The article itself seems to agree with many of the requirements for a b-class article. If I'm wrong, correct me, but I feel like this article should be rated a bit higher. Xplodio110 (talk) 18:43, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:BCLASS, it is not fully cited. I see several paragraphs that are completely lacking in a citation. Praemonitus (talk) 06:12, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Which one of the 12 zodiac conflations has 24 stars?? 209.215.92.114 (talk) 18:20, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you mean 'asterisms'? In that case, the closest is probably Capricornus at 23. Praemonitus (talk) 03:12, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow editors,

I have just modified 1 external links on Zodiac. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20230922174731/https://www.rd.com/list/mnemonic-devices-to-remember-anything/ to http://rd.com/list/mnemonic-devices-to-remember-anything

Please refer to the FaQ for information on correcting errors with the bot.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]