DZ
DefZone.Net

Kien thuc cong nghe & giai tri

Wiki Article

Template talk:Batman

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Xem trên WikipediaBài ngẫu nhiên khác

Recurring Batman villains

[edit]

Do you think Killer Moth, Maxie Zeus and the Terrible Trio should be included in the template. Batman has fought them a lot. Rtkat3 (talk) 9:30, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Batman, Inc

[edit]

Shouldn't "Batman, Inc." have a section? It's own section? I would say without their public names. I ask because I don't think Knight and Squire should be along with the rest of the Bat family. They are Inc.

Characters be splitoff

[edit]

I don't know who split-off the characters navbox but I never thought it needed a split. We needed a consensus first. Having it without all the rest of the fictional universe stuff like the Batsuit and Arkham Asylum seems out of place. We should have started with a consensus with who is going here in the first place. Never there should have been a divided navbox just because editors wanted to include everyone in it. To not have Robin, Joker, Catwoman etc. in it seems like it's a waste. There is POV either way you look into it. The other navbox does that. The list article already does that. The Superman navbox does it. But at least this navbox would be more useful. Jhenderson 777 19:02, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spliting the characters keeps a template like this form being gigantic. It's way better. Also please stop reverting yourslef back and forth.★Trekker (talk) 19:24, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It was never THAT "gigantic". Just look at Template:X-Men. Also I got the iPad go button to blame for reverting you the second time. I then reverted myself for not continuing what I was saying. Jhenderson 777 19:43, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"It's way better". That's your opinion man. I don't think this makes this navbox better. Just the other navbox better. Also everything I said on your talk page I obviously mean here too. I don't know why you question me talking on your page but since you do I will remain here for now. Jhenderson 777 19:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't feel the need to have the same conversation on more than one place, it's pretty pointless and takes time. Splitting navboxes once they get to big is pretty common. I think splitting the X-Men template might have been a good idea as well if it wasn't for the fact that that nabox is pretty much just characters anyway. Your opinon that it's not too big not anymore valid than mine that it is. Take it up to the comics project if you want more input, becuse otherwise we might just go in circles in this disscussion.★Trekker (talk) 19:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well my overall complaint is not that there is a character navbox anyway. Just that there isn't any characters on here. I don't think that dividing up a character navbox should mean that we should say goodbye to having characters here. All the characters navboxes have characters in it like the X-Men navbox did. That's kind of my point. But I do agree we will go on circles if we keep discussing it. Also I have a feeling that the consensus will be in your favor any way. So never mind. I will see with what I with the characters navbox. I still like the overall ordering of chronological appearances. But that can just be me too. Jhenderson 777 20:08, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the (now numerous) collection of navboxes at the bottom of the Batman main page, it seems to me that having a separate characters navbox is useful. There are hundreds of articles related to the primary subject at this point and it's always a good idea for a first time visitor to be able to start with page 1 and have a detailed index leading to most or all of those other articles. So I would support that split to a secondary navbox for characters.

BUT I would then suggest that THIS navbox be a meta-organization spot rather than it's current form. It could be a central repository for links to the other navboxes (which currently include "Characters", "Publications and Storylines", "Franchise Media", "Music", "Video Games", "Film", "Amusement Parks" (?) as well as the navboxes for various other comics characters strongly associated with the Batman).

At the moment this navbox seems to be a series of links to "stuff that didn't fit in those other categories" rather than a top-level navigation portal to the the broader topic of the Batman. I'd rather see one more navbox be created with "Batman Miscellanea", and have this primary navbox point to all of the rest, than have this (which is actually called "Batman") be less useful to a wikipedia user than many of those other boxes.

Just my 2 cents. I haven't been active on this box in years although I still seem to have it on my watch page -Markeer 15:30, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Batman Publications

[edit]

Should we include here only publications with "Batman" in the title, or should we also include all the publications where Batman is directly involved?

This would mean adding Trinity, JL, & JLA, but not the Batman Family titles. Is Batman Beyond a Batman title, or a Batman Family title?

As such the list would be:

  • Batman
  • Detective Comics
  • Batman Beyond
  • Trinity
  • Justice League
  • Justice League of America


Is there a template with the Batman Family Publications?

  • Batman Beyond
  • Nightwing
  • Batwoman
  • Batgirl
  • Batgirl and the Birds of Prey
  • Red Hood and the Outlaws
  • Super Sons
  • Mother Panic (?)

--Coquidragon (talk) 22:25, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be avoided. Spin-off titles about other characters or team titles don't beling on the navbox with only the specific character. I think there should be a navbox for the "ongoing Batman family publications" that is separate from this or the overall "Batman publication" template.★Trekker (talk) 22:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]