Template talk:Southern African Customs Union

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Africa: Botswana / Eswatini / Lesotho / Namibia / South Africa Africa portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Botswana portal This template is supported by WikiProject Botswana. This template is supported by WikiProject Eswatini. This template is supported by WikiProject Lesotho. This template is supported by WikiProject Namibia. South Africa portal This template is supported by WikiProject South Africa. International relations This template is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Organizations This template is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Economics Economics portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Business Business portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

This template was considered for deletion on 30 August 2013. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".