User:LevatorScapulaeSyndrome

Wikipedia enjoyer, Wikipedia community hater.

Good practice:

-Collaborating with other users to improve pages.

-Communicating about areas you are unclear on or where you disagree with someone.

-Providing sources for any position you hold, especially in a contentious disagreement.

-Informing users when they should be.

-Working towards consensus and making productive compromises.

-Rejecting fiefdoms and fallacious authority.

-Fixing SPAG when it is wrong.

-Being happy if others improve upon your work rather than jealous.

-Inviting constructive feedback.

Bad practice:

-Claiming ownership over articles.

-Reverting without informing.

-Not reading someone's comments before replying.

-Not providing sources to justify your arguments.

-Reverting and doing 'destructive' edits when positives ones would do better.

-Wiki-lawyering rather than focusing on improving the site or page.

-Roadblocking the progression of a page.

-Intrumentalising AGF to shut down criticism of conduct.

Which of these do you do?