User:PJvanMill

If you want to leave me a message, go to my talk page instead.

If you want to see a list of all of my edits, go to my contributions page instead.

This is the en-Wikipedia user page of PJvanMill (also known as pjvm, PJvM; first-name-equivalent PJ; 'he' or 'they'). I made my first edit 6 years ago.

languages

I am proficient in English and Nederlands. I understand Français and Deutsch.

interests

I like the old ideal of the hominis universalis - I have a broad range of interests. I am generally more interested in ideas than physical things, and as such I tend to read and edit mostly articles about concepts, theories and the like. I am generally NOT interested in history, geography or biology.

strengths & weaknesses

(self-evaluated, so probably biased in various ways)

strengths:

• technical stuff
• reasonable grasp of P&G

weaknesses:

• sometimes verbose
• sometimes pretty stubborn

relevant subpages

• /Modern Wikipedian values
• /WikiProject All Other Backlogs

Wikipedia activity

random item from my to-do list:

• co-production (public services): neutrality and integration work

In mainspace, I mostly do cleanup work - including making articles more neutral, performing merges &c -, usually trying to make pretty big messes into smaller messes. In Wikipedia space, I'm most active at the cleanup wikiproject, articles for deletion and the wikiproject council.

major contributions

	0						0
			0				0
	0		0		0		0
	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
(reading this table)

(to fill in later - there are probably at least one or two articles for which my work would count as a "thorough cleanup"...?)

to do

to-do items

[edit this list] co-production (public services): neutrality and integration work Karl-Günther Heimsoth: first step is consistently formatting the sources - probably best with {{sfn}} and {{harvtxt}}, {{cite contribution}} was the one I was looking for but couldn't find earlier Adrianne Gonzalez: seems probably notable (?), but promotionally overdetailed, there may be inappropriate use of sources social stigma: needs integration with consideration of due weight, might need clearer distinction between fact and opinion in some places and needs a new lede Lev Vygotsky: improve neutrality and due weight, integrate and balance different viewpoints extended mind thesis: expand with the potential sources, probably include more viewpoints corporatocracy: still a bit of a coatrack, perhaps in the solution no article exists at this title co-creation: make use of more sources, integrate into one logically structured whole

half-relevant subpages

• /One of each
• /What I use
• (list of all subpages)