Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	This is a appreciation for your hard working on the article Bini (group) on 2024. And as we celebrating for Bini 'The most searchable in Wikipedia' almost 1.2 Million views. Cheers! Royiswariii Talk! 16:03, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:14, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Acrom12,

Your wiki anniversary was 4 days ago, marking 5 years (as per SUL) of dedicated service! I wanted to extend a heartfelt thanks for your amazing contributions. With over 1,435 edits, your dedication is an inspiration to the community. Wishing you all the best for the year ahead!

Use this Tool to send wiki anniversary wishes to other amazing Wikimedians.

-- : Suyash Dwivedi (💬) 12:07, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Acrom12,

I was happy that you categorised the article This Motherless Land but returning from class now, I saw that you further tagged it for notability and sourcing issues. Really? Haven't you read about WP:NBOOK, which the book met since it was a nominee perhaps shortlist title for the Nigeria Prize for Literature, the most prestigious literary award in the country, as well as the many reviews from notable sources which meet WP:RS, hence my assumption of wrong tagging. What other sources was you expecting when you said "needs more sources for verification" when all the sentences/paragraphs has a citation? I would have simply reverted you but because I don't want you to maybe continue making that error I'm other article, hence my message herein. WP:TAGGING may be of paramount interest to you. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:07, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @SafariScribe,

Thanks for your message! I appreciate your explanation and your work on This Motherless Land. When I tagged the article, it appeared to have only one or two independent sources and one publisher listing, which did not yet meet WP:NBOOK at that stage.

I see you’ve since added multiple independent reviews and references from reliable outlets that certainly strengthens the article’s notability. I’ll take another look and, if those reviews provide significant coverage, I’m happy to remove the notability and sourcing tags.

Thanks again for improving the article and for the helpful feedback — much appreciated Acrom12 (talk) 17:32, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @SafariScribe, just wanted to clarify, when I first came across This Motherless Land, it only had the two sources (Narrative Landscape Press and Kirkus Reviews). I didn’t realize you had expanded it and added more references before I tagged it. My bad on that... sorry about the mix-up! I appreciate the improvements you made and the extra sourcing. The article’s looking much stronger now. Acrom12 (talk) 17:45, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your banner. Wondered if you'd take a look at the article now. thanks Shelter3 (talk) 11:43, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Shelter3! I took another look. The article has improved, but some statements still need citations, and a few sentences could be more neutral. Because it’s a BLP, we need solid sources for everything. Let me know when you update it again and I’ll check it. Acrom12 (talk) 12:09, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged the article because some claims were not supported by the sources, and a few sentences sounded more like a feature article than an encyclopedic entry. For a BLP, every major statement needs a clear citation, and the tone has to stay neutral. When those are fixed, the tags can be taken down. Acrom12 (talk) 12:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, not sure what you mean: I fixed the link to CNN as it was behind a paywall, maybe that will help?--Shelter3 (talk) 12:57, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing the CNN link is good, but the issue isn’t the link... it’s that some of the claims in the article are still not backed by any source at all.

A few examples:

• Parts of the Background and education section don’t have citations.
• Some sentences in Career still sound a bit promotional or “story-like,” which is why the tone tag is still there.
• A couple of statements about his influence and recognition need sources to confirm them.

The article is improving, but those unsourced lines still need proper references. Once everything is cited and the tone is a bit more neutral, the tags can be removed. Acrom12 (talk) 13:09, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They're all in the articles I cited. I didn't make any of this up. I don't like overciting especially from the same source one after another but i'll see what I can do. thanks--Shelter3 (talk) 19:50, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Shelter3, I understand, and I did read all the sources you added. The issue isn’t that the information is made up... it’s that some statements in the article aren’t actually supported by what the sources say. Because it’s a BLP, every claim needs to match the source directly. A few lines in the article go beyond what the references confirm, and that’s why the tags are still there. For example, the article says he “sees himself as a cultural ambassador to China,” but none of the sources actually phrase it that way. Acrom12 (talk) 23:08, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Acrom12. Thank you for your work on Kween Yasmin. Another editor, Royiswariii, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Passes WP:GNG. Great work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Royiswariii}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ROY is WAR Talk! 07:31, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, mate! @Royiswariii ACROM12 [TALK] 07:35, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kai Montinola, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 10:02, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Thank you for creating this article for AJAA. I also want to create this, but I have no time to do this. So, please accept this as my appreciation. ROY is WAR Talk! 09:57, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I almost to move to Ajaa (group) i thought it was just nonsense per WP:ALLCAPS. I remember that it was derived from their name lol. ROY is WAR Talk! 10:02, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Royiswariii, Aww, thank you! I'm glad I could help out. And good call on double-checking the name...it definitely looks like a violation of WP:ALLCAPS at first glance lol. Happy editing! ACROM12 [TALK] 13:03, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I also read your user page, and I was saddened by your news. I hope you recover soon, and if you need any help here, don't hesitate to ping me or visit my talk page anytime. :) ROY is WAR Talk! 01:27, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Royiswariii Thank you so much!! ACROM12 [TALK] 01:33, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Acrom12. Thank you for your work on Salome Salvi. Another editor, Royiswariii, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Passed WP:NACTRESS and WP:GNG.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Royiswariii}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ROY is WAR Talk! 00:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kontrabida Academy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 04:33, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Padre Vicente Garcia Memorial Academy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nipa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected this to Sutton, New Hampshire's education section.

I hope you feel better soon. Bearian (talk) 01:48, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @Bearian! ACROM12 [TALK] 01:50, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your attempt at styling your user page title. This didn't work for two reasons:

1. page titles are case-sensitive, so you cannot just uppercase letters, see WP:DISPLAYTITLE for details
2. display:inline-block is not allowed in style= attributes

Luckily, workarounds for both exist. Use text-transform:uppercase to capitalize "crom". And you can use inline-block if you put it into your common.css. Happy editing! Paradoctor (talk) 03:04, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @Paradoctor! I'm still trying to get the hang of the styling rules here, so I was super confused why it wouldn't save. Thanks for taking the time to explain the fix. ACROM12 [TALK] 03:09, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Acrom12. Thank you for your work on Kuku (gamer). Another editor, Royiswariii, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Considered passed on WP:NBASIC and WP:GNG. Please fix Inquirer.net to Philippine Daily Inquirer and always wikilink the sources like One Sports, ESPN etc. If not, just leave it with no link.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Royiswariii}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ROY is WAR Talk! 23:48, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @Royiswariii! ACROM12 [TALK] 00:08, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article JM Ibarra is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bloomagiliw -- Bloomagiliw (talk) 06:04, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Acrom12. I wanted to ask about your edit on the newly created FF(X) page. Was there a reason for the removal of the Design section? I had included a source (the USN press release about the FF(X) program more broadly), so I wanted to know if it was due to the very recent announcement of the project or something else. Thank you in advance.

Best, RangerRangefinder (talk) 04:03, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @RangerRangefinder, So sorry about that... looks like we had an edit conflict. I was just fixing the typo in the CNO's name (Cuddle -> Caudle) and cleaning up the date formats, and I guess I accidentally overwrote your Design section when I saved. I've just restored it along with the reference. Thanks for the heads-up! ACROM12 [TALK] 04:16, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks for the fixes!

Best, RangerRangefinder (talk) 04:17, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article JM Ibarra has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bloomagiliw -- Bloomagiliw (talk) 07:05, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shiela Valderrama, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 04:10, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Nieto, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HurricaneZeta^C 16:12, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cabral files, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Scoria (talk) 01:08, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Figueroa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Aeon Sentinel (talk) 01:28, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Acrom12, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! voorts (talk/contributions) 04:03, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @Voorts! ACROM12 [TALK] 04:07, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Acrom12,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
ROY is WAR Talk! 08:48, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

ROY is WAR Talk! 08:48, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]