Wiki Article

User talk:Akshadev

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

AfC notification: Draft:List of Agnibaan launches has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of Agnibaan launches. Thanks! --Warm Regards,Abhiiriya[@píng mє] 03:06, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Agnibaan launches has been accepted

[edit]
List of Agnibaan launches, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

--Warm Regards,Abhiiriya[@píng mє] 10:48, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Agnibaan launches for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Agnibaan launches is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Agnibaan launches until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 10:06, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops!

[edit]

Hiya, I just reverted an edit on this page, as I thought you had removed the content.

I now realise you did not remove the content, and was only shifting it.

Sorry about that.

Cheers, Randomdude123459 | Talk | Contribs | 07:37, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Randomdude123459: No worries, it's natural to react like that. It's totally okay! Have a pleasant day/night. Happy editing and regards! 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 07:39, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You too!
Randomdude123459 | Talk | Contribs | 07:40, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello Akshadev! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Created articles' list, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:11, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Astrobase (December 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
qcne (talk) 11:42, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello Akshadev! The thread you created at the Teahouse, GA review, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]