Welcome to my talk page! Hello! Please leave a new message. I will respond to your message as soon as possible. Thanks and happy editing! Also take care of the following points: If I left you a message; please answer on your talk page, using {{ping|Username}}, {{reply to|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in your response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to my talk page. And if you leave me a message; I will answer on my talk page, using {{ping|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in my response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to your talk page. Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page or at the bottom of the respective section, and use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics. Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ":" Sign and date your entry by inserting four tildes "~~~~" at the end of your message. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply. Avoid personal attacks, do not troll or use this page as a chat room. Please, always assume good faith. If the topic is something personal, please email me and leave {{ygm}} on my talk page. And if you are impressed by my contributions, consider giving me some WikiLove. ⇒Start a new topic⇐

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5.

Thanks for uploading File:Zhuoshui Fengyu Bridge during fire.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

____________________________________________________________________

Can you tell me why you rejected my draft? please check — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prasadpaturi (talk • contribs) 09:16, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page Lohia College has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:57, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page Shyodanpura has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:57, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Almost completely sourced by schools own website.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lohia College and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 03:21, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have revised the draft again and this time I have made sure that all edits are fully neutral and in accordance with wikipedia's content policies. I have used only secondary and independent sources, and kept the draft short and simple.

Kindly review the updated draft and let me know if any further improvements are needed. Thank You for your time. ViKaZo (talk) 09:10, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @ViKaZo, Still it fails WP:ORG. Thanks AlphaCore talk 20:13, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AlphaCore! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ktkvtsh (talk) 03:21, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please ensure you wait at least the full hour after a constructive edit before draftifying an article, such as Hon. James Gunu, as per WP:DRAFTNO. Signed, Guessitsavis (she/they) ^Talk 13:39, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Guessitsavis Uhhh! My bad, thanks for the reminder. AlphaCore talk 13:43, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AlphaCore,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Soil drainage for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Soil drainage to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

- 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 15:58, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AlphaCore. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation review on Rachika Suresh is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Rachika Suresh will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:39, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your move to draft on Rohith Nagesh per WP:DRAFTNO article created more than 90 days are not to be moved to draft, if you believe it's not notable, all you can do then is to nominate it for a Deletion Discussion. Destinyokhiria 💬 20:57, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it was my mistake, I think I moved couple of articles including this. AlphaCore talk 21:00, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AlphaCore. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Dinjith Ayyathan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A draft is not an article so this is not a duplicate of an article. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:22, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:35, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HJ Mitchell Thank you AlphaCore talk 22:40, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alphacore,

Thank you so much for taking the time to review my Draft:Sarah Pribis page earlier this month and for providing that helpful feedback. It really means a lot to me as I'm still learning the ropes of Wikipedia editing.

Following your suggestion, I've removed the YouTube interview sources and added references from Business Insider along with a couple from newspapers to strengthen the sourcing.

Since I'm quite new to creating articles like this, I would be incredibly grateful for any additional gentle guidance you might offer. I'm a bit nervous about resubmitting for review right now, as I'd hate for the draft to be deleted if it's still not quite ready. If possible, I'd love some more pointers first to help get it into better shape.

Thank you again for your patience and understanding, I truly appreciate your help!

Best regards, Sea2Sky Sea2sky (talk) 05:31, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sea2sky Hey,

Ref 11 and 21 are still YouTube links. Please remove them.

I also felt that there is too much details, add details that needed. Refer WP:CONTENT, WP:BLP and WP:NPOV.

Happy editing! AlphaCore talk 11:12, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AlphaCore. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin) and Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! Katie^talk 17:37, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]