Wiki Article
User talk:Andrewa
Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net
G'day! This is Andrew Alder's user talk page, you knew that. Welcome!
I prefer to discuss issues regarding any particular article, policy etc. at its talk page, so if I'm already involved in a discussion there's no need to fork the discussion to here, and if not then a simple heads-up here with a link to the relevant talk page and section is best. Be aware of the canvassing guidelines, but if you're just asking me for advice rather than a whole list of people there should be no problem there.
Please don't censor my talk page. Just because you don't support what someone else is saying is no reason to remove it. Is it now? (You wouldn't think I had to say that, but I have learned otherwise.)
On the other hand, if the edits you are removing are by banned users (or their socks), then please feel free to do it. That's not censorship, it's administrative drudgery, and I thank you for taking it on. But if there's doubt as to who the contributor really is, or if the proposed ban is not yet in force, or both, better to leave me to clean up my own page. (And again I would have thought that was obvious to all, but have learned otherwise.) A non-abusive heads-up on the other antics of the contributor, in reply to what they have said or done here, is always appreciated. TIA!If you're tempted to go below the top three levels, you might like to read User:Andrewa/How not to rant first

WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
[edit]
| |||
You've got mail
[edit]
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Andrewa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.
Happy New Year
[edit]| Happy New Year | |
| Happy New Year! May 2026 be your best year yet! BD2412 T 00:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC) |

The article Nashville tuning has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Disambiguation exist to resolve "conflicts that arise when a potential article title is ambiguous". There is nothing ambiguous about the titles of these two articles. One is about E9 tuning used for steel guitars. The other is about Nashville tuning. No reader can be confused by these two titles. This disambiguation page creates a false equivalence between the two topics which confuses readers. More importantly, none of the cited sources in either article conflates the two terms. Both tunings are used in country music's capital, but only one of them is known as "Nashville tuning". Both articles appropriately refer to each other via the "See also" template.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.
This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Your conduct at 2023 Guinea-Bissau coup attempt
[edit]Your face-saving non-answer is noted. I suggest you refamiliarize yourself with sourcing guidelines, lest you again hold on to the position that a non-expert is somehow possibly a reliable source and could be relied upon to maintain a POV article title. I also suggest you learn the importance of rhetoric in discussions, lest you again attempt to dismiss others' legitimate positions for using an incredibly common short-hand language (i.e. "expert" for "content expert") when presenting valid and persuasive cases (evidenced by your eventual agreement with those points). Happy editing! (do not ping me here) --17:36, 15 January 2026 (UTC) Pinchme123 (talk) 17:36, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
- And I suggest you read wp:civility. But as requested I will not ping you or reply on your talk page. If you wish to discuss, you know where to find me. If you don't then I will assume that you know your conduct allegation to be baseless, and disruptive. Andrewa (talk) 20:50, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
