User talk:BerryPulpy

Your submission at Articles for creation: Krithi (disambiguation) has been accepted

Krithi (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Agent 007 (talk) 14:00, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Hello! Your image was inserted successfully on the page Sanika Amit, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Per WP:AIIMAGE, Wikipedia doesn't use AI generated images of people. Belbury (talk) 13:38, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok next time i will be carefull BerryPulpy (talk) 13:39, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kuldeep Gor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kuldeep Gor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuldeep Gor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CountryANDWestern (talk) 16:35, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sanika Amit moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sanika Amit. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:43, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alisha Parveen Khan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Alisha Parveen. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 19:23, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A. R. Jaffer Sadiq moved to draftspace

Hi, I wish to express my disappointment over the moving of the page to draft space, even though it has adequate references and the subject became notable because of this activities as reported by many online news portals. I really believe that the page is eligible to be on main space. The subject became infamous and that's the reason for his notability.

You have also mentioned about COI as well as promotional ad and I don't know why you have mentioned the same. If you search, you will find more news on the subject.Please reply, so that I can pull back the page to main space again. I also see that, you had created a page Jaffer Sadiq on 2025-10-23 13:26. Is he the same person ? I am confused. Please reply.Omkaaram (talk) 14:30, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, as i see you already submited your draft for AFC review, kindly wait for responce from reviewer side. BerryPulpy (talk) 13:59, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BerryPulpy Waiting is okay, but you did n't replied about the page you have created on 2025-10-23 13:26 as Jaffer Sadiq. Is that the same person ? @Wikishovel @Explicit Omkaaram (talk) 03:57, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Omkaaram, I moved A. R. Jaffer Sadiq to Jaffer Sadiq because that's what all of the sources you cited call him: please see Wikipedia:COMMONNAME. BerryPulpy then moved Jaffer Sadiq to Draft:Jaffer Sadiq two days ago. As BerryPulpy says, it's now awaiting review there. Wikishovel (talk) 04:13, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, BerryPulpy, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you are already working on two women's biographies. In this connection, you might find it useful to look through the tips in our Ten Simple Ryles. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:06, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Thanks :) BerryPulpy (talk) 11:16, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanika Amit (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Afstromen was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

She has only two credited projects, and it appears that she had a major role in only one of them. Her career is still in its early stages, and there is not yet significant coverage in reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanika Amit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Afstromen (talk) 06:27, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BerryPulpy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Afstromen (talk) 06:27, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - November 2025

Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 11, Nos. 326, 327, 353, 354 Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes. Online events: New: Alphabet run: U, V, W | Asian women Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: Women in Red's Asian women event is part of the global Wikipedia Asian Month 2025 campaign. You are welcome to add your contributions to both event pages. Tip of the Month: Verifiability is increasingly important as AI evolves. You should ensure that every statement made is adequately sourced. There should be no less than three independent reliable sources for each biography, including at least one source for each paragraph. Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 20,473 articles created in the past year. 21 Oct 2024, 19.963% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,030,245 biographies; 405,305 women) 28 Oct 2025: 20.23% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,094,677 biographies; 423,778 women) Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help wanted! Want to apply your skills or learn new ones? Help us plan monthly events, design event logos, come up with a tip-of-the-month, and/or provide any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Ayesha Singh (actress)

Do not change the redirect from Ayesha Singh. You already know that the correct location should be Ayesha Singh where it has been deleted countless times. CNMall41 (talk) 17:07, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, Thanks :) BerryPulpy (talk) 17:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a move request to get the article moved. Without the most recent series, I'd probably have moved this to draft space as the AFD wasn't crazy long ago and it should be reviewed. For WP:IAR reasons, I'm doing the move request. The past history of AFD's will need to be added to the article talk page after the move. Ravensfire (talk) 18:11, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have a feeling it will be speedied shortly anyway. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:03, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Ravensfire and @CNMall41 for your contribution to one of the article of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red. BerryPulpy (talk) 16:04, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shreya Rukmini for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shreya Rukmini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shreya Rukmini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ravensfire (talk) 17:43, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Thank 🙏 BerryPulpy (talk) 17:45, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Arshifakhan61 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arshifakhan61. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  asilvering (talk) 12:14, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - December 2025

Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 12, Nos. 326, 327, 355, 356, 357 Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes. Online events: New: Alphabet run X, Y, Z | Food and drink | Women who died in 2025 Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: Global Translat-a-thon 2025 06 December 2025 Tip of the Month: Lists of deaths by year is a good resource for the December / January meet-up Women who died in 2025 Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help wanted! Want to apply your skills or learn new ones? Help us plan monthly events, design event logos, come up with a tip-of-the-month, and/or provide any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:16, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]