User talk:Big Mocc

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 13:11, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what good is that if it’s just incorrect? this should be a neutral and factual encyclopedia, not wokeipedia that praises a terrorist group because you don’t like the other side, and as a result won’t use the word “terrorist”, they target civilians and use suicide bombings in an islamic movement, they are by definition a terrorist organisation Big Mocc (talk) 13:28, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

additionally, Israeli citizens who have nothing to do with this conflict get murdered daily by Hamas, they were innocent people slaughtered by terrorists, not a “political movement” Big Mocc (talk) 13:34, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This was not an invitation to argue here. Get to WP:XC and the Wikipedia community will consider your perspective. In the process, you'll likely learn how to make arguments with reference to sources that will actually be taken seriously; reference-free arguments say more about your own priors than they do about the topic or what's correct to print in a Wikipedia article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 13:49, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Redacted), so a “contentious topic” means we praise terrorists and NOBODY is allowed to disagree, also your condescension has no effect on me, you’re not correct, i am Big Mocc (talk) 16:31, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for personal attacks and battleground behaviour. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:43, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect editing

A++ would buy again 180.150.39.137 (talk) 02:17, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]