Wiki Article

User talk:CeltBrowne

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Orphaned non-free image File:Liam de Róiste.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Liam de Róiste.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion to Template:Professional wrestling sidebar

[edit]

I saw you reverted my change to the sidebar, you said Neither is of sufficient notability, I disagree. You have the first woman to hold the major "mens" world title in a major pro-wrestling company, and the first WWE Wrestler to hold the knockouts world title while working for WWE. I dont know if there is an agreed upon standard for notability in this list but I see Giulia is listed. How is she more notable? Sephiroth storm (talk) 08:11, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As discussed on Template talk:Professional wrestling sidebar#Notable women criteria, notability for the women was decided using consensus and reliable secondary sources for professional wrestling, such as Pro Wrestling Illustrated Top 100/Top 150 rankings for women wrestlers. The wrestlers included in the sidebar consistently rank highly on the rankings over several years. The likes of Jacy Jayne have not ranked highly consistently highly over an extended period. CeltBrowne (talk) 08:20, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bigfoot FC logo.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bigfoot FC logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 02:21, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ligue1 Québec logo.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ligue1 Québec logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Margaret Collins-O'Driscoll.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Margaret Collins-O'Driscoll.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Connolly

[edit]

Thanks for correcting my duplication of material on her page. Not sure how I missed that. BobFromBrockley (talk) 15:57, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • *Thumbs Up*

boothy443 ( 72 | 65 | 63 | 74 | 6f ) 02:47, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BFC Germania 1888.svg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BFC Germania 1888.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]