[edit]

Hello @Class 934, thank you for disclosing that you're a paid editor on your userpage. I would like to ensure you are aware that the paid editing policy also requires that you disclose [your] employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any paid contribution to Wikipedia. Thank you! fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 14:31, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcos Eduardo Elias (December 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheInevitables was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TheInevitables (talk) 04:07, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Class 934! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheInevitables (talk) 04:07, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]