Wiki Article
User talk:Connormah
Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net
 | Connormah is away/busy and may not respond swiftly to queries. |  |
Hello, Connormah could you contact Majorie Taylor Greene's office and get the full high res version of her portrait? Putitonamap98 (talk)
Jim Simon (American football)
[edit]Nomination of Jim Simon (American football) for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Simon (American football) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Do you like Japan?
[edit]Do you like Japan? Because I saw your map. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.111.253.64 (talk • contribs)
The Bugle: Issue 236, December 2025
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:18, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Recent death template
[edit]Hi Connormah. I have a question about the {{Recent death}} template removal on Candy Raymond. I added it because the article was getting a number of unsourced edits about death details (date, location, etc.). The template cautions people about making unsourced changes and that caution seems to be needed for a few days here. I think I included it appropriately given the template guidance and the activity on the article, but could you elaborate on your reasoning to remove it? Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:17, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- I tend to think it should be used very sparingly, with emphasis on the "unconfirmed or inaccurately reported information about a recently deceased person" and "in cases of extraordinary public attention" stated in the template documentation, such as for Rob Reiner as a recent example (or Kobe Bryant as another earlier one). The difference being that information was being reported in the news on a rapidly-changing basis in both of those cases; in this case, the only reported news was an announcement of her death, with no elaboration. As the bio is still covered by BLP per WP:BDP (and WP:V is still relevant), I think the protection is sufficient. Unfortunately it's a weird case where time zones and the timing of the announcement have created ambiguity over the specific date/year of death, but hopefully something more clear comes out. Connormah (talk) 04:17, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for explaining. I'd note that the template documentation says it
should be used only in cases where many editors (perhaps dozens or more) are editing the article on the same day
. Given the number of unsourced changes and the high rate of edits (about 85 edits since her death), it seems to meet that threshold. I appreciate the discussion, but I think raising the bar so high that it only applies to cases as sensational as the death of Rob Reiner or Kobe Bryant is probably not helpful to the project. Also bear in mind that the intent is only to use the template for a brief period of time. It's very likely to be unnecessary in a day or two. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:52, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for explaining. I'd note that the template documentation says it