User talk:Dabmasterars

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Dabmasterars! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Nyakase (talk • guestbook) 14:04, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Foamstars has been accepted

Foamstars, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– AllCatsAreGrey ^(talk) 20:34, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cubic Odyssey (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Many sources are unreliable, see WP:VG/S.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cubic Odyssey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:14, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cubic Odyssey (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:TOOSOON still; probably wait until post launch reviews, incorporate them and submit again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cubic Odyssey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:26, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of eponymous albums

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of eponymous albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of eponymous albums (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:22, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I think about it, I probably should've created a category instead. It might already exist, though. Dabmasterars (talk) 20:17, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Dabmasterars. Thank you for your work on Stop Killing Games. Another editor, Johnson524, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I have reviewed the page. Thank you for expanding Wikipedia's coverage of gaming and breaking news! Have a blessed day,

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Johnson524}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Johnson524 03:14, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Stop Killing Games

On 3 July 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stop Killing Games, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the YouTuber behind Stop Killing Games compared video-game publishers shutting down online-only games to silent-era film studios "burning their own films ... to recover the silver content"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stop Killing Games. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Stop Killing Games), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 38,552 views (1,606.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Dabmasterars Thank you so much for your work on the article, and for helping to get it on the front page! It was a hugely pleasant surprise to see it in DYK. Apfelmaische (talk) 21:18, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure, I'm just doing what I can to spread awareness of the initiative. I was pleasantly surprised receiving the DYK notification, but also kind of proud, thinking about the potential effects of me creating the article. Dabmasterars (talk/contribs) 21:27, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, good job avoiding the many pitfalls of Wikipedia activism. Keep up the good work and continue to mind the the five pillars and core content policies. Apfelmaische (talk) 22:15, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to add that information but oh well...

When I saw the information about 1 million signatures, I thought that this addition is not really sufficient as there might be invalid signatures which will be debunked at the end of the signing time.

Actually thank you for adding the information about possible invalid signs, was about to mention it in the article's talk page.

79.191.221.30 (talk) 17:39, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alighn userboxes

Hello, i can't tell if you're joking about the "Alighn" userboxes but just in case. In the source editor add "<br />" In between the Userboxes

Cheers! 1timeuse75 (talk) 15:48, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I kinda want to keep it that way because funny, but I will consider using your method if I ever want to make my userpage serious. Dabmasterars (talk/contribs) 15:54, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome.

PS, great work with the SKG article! 1timeuse75 (talk) 15:56, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Dabmasterars. Thank you for your work on Hell Pie. Another editor, Vrxces, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good work on drafting this mate. The reception section is a bit bare-bones and borderline fine for notability, but seeing the calibre of the other sources cited in Metacritic understand why you went with the ones you have. Wonder if the aggregators missed any RS? Apparently there's a Prima Games and Play UK Magazine review out there somewhere.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vrxces}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 05:09, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Album of the Year (website)

Hello, Dabmasterars. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Album of the Year (website), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shadman (artist)

Hello, Dabmasterars. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shadman (artist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:08, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:LilKirbs

Hello, Dabmasterars. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LilKirbs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rater

Hiya, I noticed that you don't rate your articles on the content assessment scale. So I want you to be aware about User:Evad37/rater. It helps with assess pages.

Hope this helps! 1timeuse75 (talk) 19:28, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for introducing the tool, I didn't know about it. I try to not rate my own articles due to not understanding the rating system's specifics plus a lot of things that may affect the rating. The automatic system for ratings at Special:NewPagesFeed seems to just look at the amount of words/letters without assessing the sources or images. Dabmasterars [RU/COM] (talk/contribs) 08:14, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Dabmasterars. Thank you for your work on Shredders (video game). Another editor, 11WB, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This looks fine, however it is important to quote what the source actually says. For example, Windows Central says the game has "frequent performance issues, but the article uses the word "unstable" instead. This would be an acceptable summary without the quotations. It would be good to go over the article one more time to make these corrections. Good work otherwise!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|11WB}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

11WB (talk) 20:07, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vicious Delicious

Hello, Dabmasterars. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vicious Delicious, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:09, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Adoring Fan

Hello, Dabmasterars. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Adoring Fan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]